I don’t have a problem with BNP policies being discussed here, but

Comment on General Election 2010 Poll Results by David.

I don’t have a problem with BNP policies being discussed here, but when I didn’t moderate BNP commenter’s it completely took over the site with what can only be described as BNP trash the Lib/Lab/Con propaganda!

There was no real discussion, if you’ve been reading this site for a awhile you may have noticed I’ve started probably over a dozen comment threads on the BNP policy to link military national service to the right to vote (no military service = no right to vote under the BNP!!!) and so far no BNP commenter has taken up the challenge to discuss that BNP pledge: it’s a pledge from the 2005 BNP general election manifesto since the BNP haven’t published a 2010 manifest yet. Closest to a debate is one commenter said he thinks the pledge was removed in 2005, but provided no evidence to support that view. Even BNP candidates and organisers who have commented here refuse to discuss BNP policy!!

The vast majority of BNP commenter’s concentrate on trashing Britain as it is today and not discussing the rights and wrongs of BNP policy and where they would take the country.

I don’t disagree with everything the BNP wants to do, there’s a few good ideas, but they tend to take everything to the extreme rather than a moderate response. Take BNP immigration policy, a moderate policy would be to control immigration, make immigration work for Britain (we do have skills shortages). The BNP response to the immigration problems (and there are problems) is completely stop immigration with no date to reinstate controlled immigration, it’s throwing the baby out with the bath water.

UKIP’s immigration policy is more moderate, it’s still more strict than I like with a 5 year stop to immigration, but at least it’s realistic. I can understand if a new party came into power completely stopping immigration while that party got it’s new immigration legislation etc… through parliament (I could understand stopping immigration for 2 years, 5 years is too long).

On immigration I like where Labour are going, Australian points based system that makes immigration works for Britain, it’s a real shame they didn’t bring it in much sooner. Labour has made some big mistakes on immigration, but it’s getting better.

There are 18 pages on BNP policy under https://general-election-2010.co.uk/votes/bnp-policies/ and they are some of the most commented pages on the site, so the BNP supporters certainly get the opportunity to have their say on this website. It’s this ONE general election poll page I don’t want filled with BNP propaganda.

To prove my point that the BNP is openly discussed here paste this line into a Google search:

site:https://general-election-2010.co.uk/ BNP

This will list every page that the BNP is mentioned on this website.

BNP 2440 pages found.

Now replace BNP with Labour etc…

Labour 2390 pages found.
Conservative 2590 pages found.
Liberal Democrat 1240 pages found.
UKIP 1630 pages found.
Green 1800 pages found.

Gordon Brown 1440 pages found.
David Cameron 2090 pages found.
Nick Clegg 1030 pages found.
Pearson 45 pages found.
Caroline Lucas 65 pages found.
Nick Griffin 359 pages found.

To put it into perspective a search for other words:

Cannabis 54 pages found.
Hung Parliament 427 pages found.
Poll 1930 pages found.
Islamification 453 pages found.
Immigration 1110 pages found.

This search:

site:https://general-election-2010.co.uk/

Tells us how many pages (in total) are indexed by Google and it’s currently 2,820 pages.

Only 380 pages on this site don’t mention the BNP! Only the Conservatives as a party are mentioned more than the BNP on my site.

David