The EU is constitutionally at this moment in time, more important than the ECHR. We are required to give “precedence” to EU law. As I understand it, the ECHR is not entrenched against either implied or express repeal and therefore theoretically it could be repealed. What is taking place now a farce, for this Government could pull out of the ECHR IF THEY REALLY WANTED TO DO THAT. However, it rather looks as if Mr Cameron does not want to, but is looking rather to more deeper and more integration into the European union. I say that with confidence because the Legislation that he is implementing at present proves that, for it is all towards deeper and more meaningful EU integration. (The dismantling of the NHS in readiness to join the Euro in the next Parliament) The Localism Bill, (Towards local and Regional Governance-yes, another layer of Government-unless we lose our Commons) The EU’s TEN-T program, which covers land-roads and rail, air and sea. For the EU’s Motorway in the Sea, for the Single European Sky and the Ports. That “PORTS” had me puzzled until I realised for ‘EU’ ships to come in and out of our Ports they would be within the 12 mile limit and thus-it would not be THEIRS, so will we lose the 12 mile limit? Will World Maps have to be altered? Will the English Channel become as a rather large river between England and France in just one big EU State of? I don’t know, but I can’t see any other explanation for all that is in the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) Policy.
