Also see the BNP Manifesto 2010. The British National Party (BNP) is a far-right political party with strong racist and fascist roots. Formed as a splinter group from the racist/fascist National Front by John Tyndall in 1982. Until 2009, when the BNP was challenged in the courts on grounds of racial discrimination, it restricted membership […]
Continue Reading Reasons to Vote British National Party : BNP 2010 General Election
“The British National Party (BNP) is a far-right political party.”
WRONG the BNP is a centre party NOT far/extreme right. There are far more right wing parties than the bnp in Britain today.
“The BNP under Nick Griffin wasted 10s of thousands of pounds of their member’s fees on fighting their illegal whites only membership policy through the courts.”
WRONG. We were dragged to the courts by a corrupt system determined to destroy us. Court fees were inevitable. The EGM at which the MAJORITY of bnp voting members voted to change the constitution was delayed by severe weather conditions.
Some members wanted to keep the constitution unchanged simply because of principle. The Black Police Association was not hauled up to court to change its membership criteria. Nor was the association of black lawyers. Why should they be allowed to keep restricting membership based on ethnicity when we are not? Equality and all that.
It restricted membership to only people of “Caucasian origin”.
WRONG. Membership was restricted to those of INDIGENOUS BRITTISH DESCENT. This meant the native peoples of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales. Also known as the British Isles and referred to in the constitution as our homeland. Guess what the native brits are white. Big deal. If native brits were black we would still have restricted membership.
The BNP does not care about Skin Colour. Never has. We care about the British Culture and way of life and want to preserve it for our future and our children.
“Firm but voluntary and very expensive incentives for immigrants and their descendants to return home”
If Migrants want to go home they can go and we will help them. We won’t forcibly deport every single migrant we find. Only Illegal Migrants and Legal ones who have broken the law. Can’t say that’s not fair.
“This policy would cost British tax payers billions and result in a shortage of trained workers”
WRONG. This policy would not cost billions. I doubt there are very many migrants who WANT to go home. We WILL help those that do. The education reforms (teaching skills and trades in school and scrapping student loans/debt ((education is a right NOT a privilege so education at college/university would be free for all supported and paid for by the state in the form of grants)) so that more people can learn valuable skills that benefit a working society) will ensure that there is no shortage of trained workers.
“And the repeal of anti-discrimination legislation whilst adding more discriminating legislation to favour the “indigenous population”.
We won’t be adding discriminating legislation to favour the indigenous. The repeal of these laws is for one simple fact. The job should go to the person best suited for it. NOT the person who helps fill a politically correct quota. Best man for the job.
View Comment
““The British National Party (BNP) is a far-right political party.”
WRONG the BNP is a centre party NOT far/extreme right. There are far more right wing parties than the bnp in Britain today. ”
ROFLOL, LOL, PMSLOL
You put your comment in the wrong section try, https://general-election-2010.co.uk/political-jokes/ next time.
BNP not a far-right political party, I’ve not laughed so hard in years :-)
By writing the BNP aren’t far right you completely discredit the rest of your comment so much I don’t even have to waste my time explaining why you are so wrong, wrong, wrong on everything.
Thank you so much, for the belly laughs, I’ve given your comment a thumbs up.
David
View Comment
“The British National Party (BNP) is a far-right political party.”
Since I did invite this type of comment and despite what you’ve said is a bit of a joke, I should respond.
Pretty much every source you’ll find will list the BNP as far right politically. It’s a joke to argue they are a centre politics party.
“The BNP under Nick Griffin wasted 10s of thousands of pounds of their member’s fees on fighting their illegal whites only membership policy through the courts.”
I love the black Police Association argument/comparison. The Black Police Association is not a political party, my understanding is it’s not illegal to have an organisation like the BPA to only allow members of one race, sex etc… That being said the BPA do allow white members, though not full members. Not familiar with the Association of Black Lawyers (same concept as the BPA?).
It is illegal for a political party to prevent membership on race. Do I agree with that law, NO, because political parties are out to represent a particular group in society and I have no problem with the BNP only representing white people born in Britain (why not?). If that’s what the British electorate want as MPs, so be it, if not they won’t vote BNP, isn’t that the whole point of politics? I don’t see this as any different to Labour representing the working class and the Conservatives representing big business and rich people.
My point was the BNP had an illegal whites only membership policy, (remind us how many non white members the BNP had again?) doesn’t matter if you or I agree the law that makes their membership policy illegal is wrong, what matters is the BNP leadership should have known better than to waste all that money on fighting a court case they couldn’t possibly win under current laws when a general election was approaching. That money probably could have fielded 400+ BNP candidates had they not wasted all that money on court case they couldn’t win! It suggests they are fiscally irresponsible or don’t want to gain power!
It restricted membership to only people of “Caucasian origin”.
Please, that’s semantics. Indigenous population as you say means white and that makes the membership policy illegal. It’s irrelevant if it’s right or wrong, there’s loads of laws that are wrong, but we still have to follow them until they are changed (if ever).
“Firm but voluntary and very expensive incentives for immigrants and their descendants to return home”
The above is a BNP policy from the 2005 general election manifesto, the exact wording is:
“We will end immigration to the UK and reduce our land’s population burden by
creating firm but voluntary incentives for immigrants and their descendants to
return home.”
The concept behind this policy is to reduce the number of people living in Britain, with a tendency to benefit the indigenous population: British white people aren’t offered a generous incentive to leave (the BNP want white people to stay).
This policy is in place in Denmark and it’s costing a small fortune to persuade settled immigrants to up and leave to their original country with their families.
“This policy would cost British tax payers billions and result in a shortage of trained workers”
What has education reforms got to do with the costs of a voluntary repatriation scheme and the immediate shortages this would have on the country? Education/training takes years, unless you think your BNP brothers can over night become trained and experienced doctors, nurses and dentists to replace those the BNP have paid to leave?
It would take over a decade to replace the trained migrant workers we’d loose under a BNP government! And that’s assuming we could get the numbers in training ASAP, if it was that easy, why isn’t it already happening, why are not enough of our young people training to be doctors, engineers, scientists etc..?
For the repatriation policy to have an effect on the population it’s got to be taken up by millions of settled immigrants. It’s been shown in Denmark for this to work the government has to offer a lot of money, if you want to get rid of millions of legally settled immigrants it’s going to cost billions. Do the research you’ll see I’m right.
If it doesn’t get rid of millions from our population, what’s the point, that would make it a failed BNP policy?
Add to this the BNP want to reduce the number of Muslims in Britain, you can imagine the people this “firm but voluntary incentives” policy would target for voluntary repatriation. I’m curious what “firm but voluntary” means?
“And the repeal of anti-discrimination legislation whilst adding more discriminating legislation to favour the “indigenous population”.
Erm, the BNP are always talking about British Jobs for British Workers, that’s not a “Best man for the job” approach (I agree it should be best man for the job). If the BNP gained power and brought in British Jobs for British Workers legislation that would be discriminating legislation to favour the “indigenous population”.
David
View Comment
Pretty much every source you’ll find will list the BNP as far right politically. It’s a joke to argue they are a centre politics party.
Pretty much every source is against us mate. What do you expect them to say?
I love the black Police Association argument/comparison. The Black Police Association is not a political party, my understanding is it’s not illegal to have an organisation like the BPA to only allow members of one race, sex etc… That being said the BPA do allow white members, though not full members. Not familiar with the Association of Black Lawyers (same concept as the BPA?).
Regardless of whether or not it’s a political group or not NO group should be allowed to restrict membership on the basis of race. If one can do then so can anyone that is the point.
Please, that’s semantics. Indigenous population as you say means white and that makes the membership policy illegal
Actually no. If a polish/Russian/Norwegian or any other white person from ANY country came here and registered as a British citizen they would still not have been allowed membership even though they were white because they are not indigenous brits. We don’t care about skin colour.
British white people aren’t offered a generous incentive to leave
Bring a pole who registered as British. The offer would be open to him. Oh yeah he’d be white and legally (not ethnically) British.
What has education reforms got to do with the costs of a voluntary repatriation scheme and the immediate shortages this would have on the country? Education/training takes years, unless you think your BNP brothers can over night become trained and experienced doctors, nurses and dentists to replace those the BNP have paid to leave?
They wouldn’t all leave on the same day you know. It would take time. That time would be used to train our people and give them the skills that would be needed. Also why should we selfishly take highly skilled workers such as doctors from third world countries that desperately need them? (Third world countries are an utter mess you know)
why are not enough of our young people training to be doctors, engineers, scientists etc..?
Because this government places emphasis not on trade, skill and labour but knowledge. The government attitude is that we will base our economy on knowledge and other countries like china can do the nasty metal banging and labour. An attitude i find quite racist to be honest. We think we are superior and can use our knowledge (when Asians have proven to be on average more intelligent than us) but the poor little Chinese/Indian peasant can just sit there and hit metal with a hammer all day.
Add to this the BNP want to reduce the number of Muslims in Britain
No we don’t we want an end to extremism and that’s all. This is a Christian country so we want it to remain a Christian country. We have no problem with moderate Muslims (who make up the vast majority) who don’t force their opinions on everyone and respond with violence to every real or imagined minor rebuttal.
Erm, the BNP are always talking about British Jobs for British Workers, that’s not a “Best man for the job” approach (I agree it should be best man for the job). If the BNP gained power and brought in British Jobs for British Workers legislation that would be discriminating legislation to favour the “indigenous population”.
Aye British Jobs SHOULD go to British Workers. People whose family has lived here for multiple generations and has made contributions to society. Not newly arrived migrants fresh off the boat.
The British jobs thing was in response to the massive number of employers only hiring migrants who work for a pittance.
And it’s worse than that. A Bernard Matthews packing plant in England will now not hire any British person AT ALL REGARDLESS OF SUITABILITY UNLESS HE CAN PROVE HE CAN SPEAK POLISH FLUENTLY. How many brits do you think there are whose job opportunities include packing sausages into crates who can speak polish?
Also in regard to this comment.
““The British National Party (BNP) is a far-right political party.”
WRONG the BNP is a centre party NOT far/extreme right. There are far more right wing parties than the bnp in Britain today. ”
ROFLOL, LOL, PMSLOL
You put your comment in the wrong section try, https://general-election-2010.co.uk/political-jokes/ next time.
BNP not a far-right political party, I’ve not laughed so hard in years :-)
Stop with the sarky comments. There is no need for them. Also I’m from Glasgow so no one beats us weegies for sarcastic humour.
View Comment
BNP political conspiracy theories again, what a shock a BNP supporter believes in conspiracies!
Let me get this right, everyone is against the BNP, so it’s some big conspiracy to mislead the country, NO the world into believing the BNP is a far right political party when it’s really just another center ground party like Labour, Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats?
Tell you what Mark, for arguments sake lets say you are right about everything. Everyone is against the BNP for whatever reason, they aren’t a bunch of racist white supremacists and all the negativity about the BNP is political propaganda to keep them out of power or something.
Lets look at the BNP policies like we would say the Labour party policies or the Conservative party policies and judge them on their merits.
The BNP plan to link the right to vote with serving in the military, either actually in the military or some form of national service.
How do you feel about having your right to vote linked to doing some form of military service, do you agree with this undemocratic policy and if so why?
Do you like the idea of every household having to own a firearm, (not a choice, but HAVE to own one) though if you don’t do military service you can’t own a gun. I suppose a BNP slogan could be:
No gun, no vote!
After we’ve discussed this BNP policy we can cover another one Mark.
I think this is more than reasonable, you get to shout the virtues of the BNP policies, which after all is why people vote for political parties (what they’ll do if they gain power).
David
View Comment
Let me get this right, everyone is against the BNP, so it’s some big conspiracy to mislead the country, NO the world into believing the BNP is a far right political party when it’s really just another center ground party like Labour, Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats?
The three main parties are against us as are the mass media. The media is how the majority of people get their information. They just sit there listen to what the government tells them and automatically believe it. If the news says it true then it must be true is their thought process. The news constantly calls us racists and bigots and so the people think we are. Unfortunately this brings in some people who like us because they think we are racists and bigots but no worries because they quickly leave or don’t bother with us after they realize we won’t tolerate racism in the party.
Labour, Tories and the Lib Dems. Do you honestly suspect that these parties would EVER want to tell the people the truth about us? The labour government is made up of mostly so called “Ex” communists (no such thing as an ex-communist really) these far left nutjobs are hardly going to go about telling everyone that a nationalist party has good ideas now are they? Corrupt, selfish, arrogant and greedy this is the basis of our disgusting red commie government. Their frantic and hysterical attempts to silence us with repeated smear campaigns, lies and plain violence (the violent UAF are sponsored by all three parties and funded with taxpayers’ money. Do you want YOUR tax money to go to a group dedicated to the removal of free speech and democracy in Britain?) are the result of the fact that they KNOW people are turning to us, listening to us because we speak common sense and that we genuinely have Britain’s interests at heart.
The BNP plan to link the right to vote with serving in the military, either actually in the military or some form of national service.
Soldiers don’t have the right to vote now either. A vote is cast on their behalf for the party that is currently in power. I have it on good authority (from my servicemen friends both past and current) that most of the armed forces support the bnp but can’t come out and say it for fear of losing their jobs.
We will introduce a return to national service. Military or civil service is your choice however. The voting for soldiers would stay the same i assume. The bnp will NEVER remove the right to vote from ANY British person. We brits fought and died for the right of the common man to vote. To take that right away would be an insult to those brave men who challenged the all-powerful might of a tyrannical king.
Do you like the idea of every household having to own a firearm, (not a choice, but HAVE to own one) though if you don’t do military service you can’t own a gun.
From the bnp 2005 manifesto.
The Firearms part of this manifesto is for people to be able to protect their homes and families from intruders wishing to cause them serious harm.
Non army personnel may not keep an Assault Rifle but may own shotguns, bolt action rifles, handguns and such. No automatic weapons will be available to people who were never in the military.
This is mainly for self-defence from robberies and personal attacks but also in the exceptionally unlikely instance that a government becomes so convinced of its own power that it starts to ignore our basic rights and welfare. In other words if our government ends up like the government of third world countries then at least the ability of the government to use force to suppress us is greatly diminished when we have the capability of fighting back. This is the system that is in place in Switzerland AND America.
View Comment
I’ve read the BNP 2005 General Election Manifesto which is where I found the information about the BNP’s national service plans and plan to link the right to vote with military service.
“The bnp will NEVER remove the right to vote from ANY British person.”
But they will Mark, take a read of my comment at https://general-election-2010.co.uk/reasons-to-vote-british-national-party-bnp-2010-general-election/comment-page-30/#comment-5085
Here’s the important parts from the comment.
The BNP’s National Service commitment is part of the BNP Defence policy which I have a full copy of at: https://general-election-2010.co.uk/bnp-policies-defence-no-more-cuts/ there’s a link to the original BNP Defence policy document on the page above.
“- Restore national service for our young with the option of civil or military service.”
As it’s only a mention of national service (the BNP don’t have a full 2010 general election manifesto yet) I dug deeper and the BNPs 2005 General Election Manifesto mentions it quite a bit.
I’ve uploaded a copy of the The 2005 BNP General Election Manifesto to my site at: https://general-election-2010.co.uk/bnp-manifesto/BNP-General-Election-Manifesto-2005.pdf as it’s not that easy to find online.
Under the BNP no military service = no right to vote.
This is directly from the BNP, not made up by the media or the Lib/Lab/Con political conspirator’s, this is British National Party policy.
Don’t worry about it Mark you aren’t the first BNP supporter and won’t be the last to comment on my site without actually understanding what the BNP plan to do in your name when you vote for them.
Again now you know what the BNP want to do, do you agree with linking military service with the right to vote?
A yes or no answer with an explanation if yes would be appreciated.
BTW I indented (used a blockquote) the BNP 2005 General Election Manifesto quote in your last comment to make it clear what was BNP policy and what was your comment so we didn’t need your second comment (deleted now) explaining the end of the quote.
David
View Comment
Right sorry about the delay i was looking out info on the subject.
David the right to vote connected with national service was scrapped in 2005 i believe. It’s certainly not in the latest manifesto/constitution.
Here are some other BNP polices (and other parties that hold them)
We support the return of corporal punishment(Conservative)
Capital punishment for paedophiles, terrorists and murderers. (Conservative/arguably socialist)
Reintroduction of military service. (Likewise, Conservative/Socialist)
More share ownership/workers co-operatives. (very socialist policy, that)
Extra resources for gifted and struggling children (very Liberal policy)
Repossessed houses becoming Council houses (social democratic)
Animal welfare and environmental rights (Liberal)
Support Greenpeace and the ban on whaling (cross-party)
View Comment
“the right to vote connected with national service was scrapped in 2005 i believe.”
Mark I’ve looked into this in detail and I’ve not seen any announcements it was removed as a policy. Where did you get this information from or are you assuming it’s removed?
Why would they remove it in 2005 when it was part of the 2005 manifesto?
“It’s certainly not in the latest manifesto/constitution.”
The BNP don’t have a 2010 manifesto yet, unless I’ve missed it?
They have some brief policy snippets, but no actual detailed manifesto like they had for the 2005 general election.
David
View Comment
ROFLOL do you really think this site is some kind of democracy where you can vote the moderator out and replace him/her with a person of your choice?
I realise you are a BNP supporter, so not very clever, but you must realise I own this web site? Seriously, you can’t be that deluded to believe this is some kind of collective community where you have democratic rights, can you???
Your comment comes from the premise that moderating this site is my job or something, hired by the owner who can take the role away. I paid MY money to register the domain name general-election-2010.co.uk, which I and I alone will own for as long as I pay the yearly registration fees (plan to keep it forever BTW). I also pay for the hosting (dedicated server at $99 a month), built the website, gained it really good rankings in Google etc… that generates quite a bit of traffic.
It case it’s not sunk in, I own this website and only I get to moderate comments. If you don’t like it, don’t comment on MY website.
Now if you feel you could do a better job, make your way over to a domain name registration company like Fasthosts (good for .co.uk domains) or Godaddy (they don’t do .co.uk domains), register a domain name, buy some web hosting and off you go showing us how it should be done without upsetting BNP supporters.
Your ONLY recourse if you believe this: “I find your remarks about the BNP offensive and so much out of context” is to comment on MY site and be thankful I don’t delete your comments. Be aware, commenting on MY site is a privilege NOT a right, those who abuse the privilege have their comments deleted.
Good luck if you start a general election site and let us know how it goes :-)
WOW I can understand why this commenter votes BNP. I wouldn’t be surprised under a BNP government that my site would be “acquired” by the government for the public good.
David
View Comment
As a BNP supporter what you’ve just accused me of is very funny.
When I started this site I was relatively ignorant of the BNP (knew what the media told me, racist/fascist party). I gave the BNP commenter’s a chance and discussed politics openly with them not assuming they were all racist/fascists only to be insulted whenever I disagreed with them!
So blame the earlier BNP supporting commenter’s for my current approach of not wasting my time being nice to BNP commenter’s! Also doesn’t help that the vast majority refuse to engage in real debate, take the BNPs national service policy, no BNP supporters want to discuss that the BNP plan to remove the right to vote for those who haven’t done some form of military service! Do you like that BNP policy?
If you read the BNP comments on my site you’ll find according to some BNP supporters:
I’m a member of UAF.
I’m a member of SearchLight.
I’m paid by Labour or the Conservatives to run this site.
Me and another commenter called Vote No To BNP are the same person.
I’m a traitor to Britain.
I’m conspiring to keep the BNP out of power.
I removed BNP from the poll because my pay masters told me to (LOL).
I’ve lied about the 800+ cheat BNP votes in the election poll.
And a bunch of other stuff.
And you’ve just done similar with this statement:
“Just because you and a few Britons think about PC, Human Rights and Civil Liberties 1st before the Danger of what this Islamic Cancer is doing to the World”
Assuming you know what I stand for. When have I said political correctness is important to me? I happen to despise political correctness. If you saw some of my other websites you’d think I was a racist Christian sex toy user, when I’m a non-racist atheist who used to sell adult products as a business because they have a great markup. My business (SEO Consultant) is related to websites, own over 100 of them. I am concerned about human rights and civil liberties, but no more than the average man in the street.
I don’t see Islam as a significant threat to our way of life. Actually I think the threat of Islamic terrorism and what it’s turned us into (paranoid of terrorism and Muslims) is causing more damage to our society than the actual terrorism! That’s not to say I want Islam to be embraced in this country, I think it’s a backwards religion especially when it comes to women (though I think all religions are backwards). I certainly wouldn’t want Sharia law to be part of our laws, but then I don’t see that ever happening. But then I don’t have a problem with Sharia law being practiced voluntarily by Muslims who also accept they have to live by British laws first.
“Think of 9/11 & 7/7 Were these acts justified??? Were these acts normal from Civilised people????”
No not justified, no not acts of civilised people. IRA who are Catholics used the same tactics, do you believe all Irish Catholics are murderous and uncivilised? Do you condemn the entire Catholic faith or all Irish people because of a small group who pervert it’s message?
BTW if you’ve read the Qur’an why do you call it the Koran?
Oh and I never asked BNP supporters to comment on my site. In the early months a lot of them came to my site and pretty much took over the comments, because I agree with free speech I didn’t stop them I waited for others who disagreed with the BNP to balance the comments.
When I tried to make a comment on the BNP website about the local BNP candidate in my area, the comment was deleted. At least I allow BNP supporters to comment on my site despite the BNP not allowing me to comment on their website!
David
View Comment
Neither are wrong, different regions different spellings I think Koran is under Roman alphabetic translation but Qu’ran (the Arabic Semitic pronunciation) is more widely accepted and used.
Just try not to get into a debate with a scholar about it:-)
Well at least I only post under one name Dave, or should I call you Jon?
You’ve been posting on my site for over a month under the name Jon and now you’ve started posting under the name David and Jon at the same time.
Why?
In your earlier Jon comments you are in the army (Sergeant) and in your David comments a business owner. Which is it? Do you even have a job?
You’ve been caught out as a two faced BNP supporting liar, I understand why you support the BNP, you’ll fit in well there.
You are one of the BNP numpties who accused me of being more than one person: https://general-election-2010.co.uk/reasons-to-vote-british-national-party-bnp-2010-general-election/comment-page-29/#comment-4594
Jon/David you just lost all credibility, not that as a BNP supporter you had any anyway.
Since you started posting on my site with the name Jon, please only use Jon from now on or I’ll mark all your new comments with the moderator note or delete them.
David
View Comment
Not at all David, Now who is pointing the finger???? lol I have a brother who uses my pc as it is in my office here at home. See you are as unpopular as ever. May be one day you will see your true bitter self before you depart from your selfish life. Not too late to change your ways David.
Jon & David
View Comment
PMSLOL, not heard that one before when a commenter is caught out. You and your brother have a very similar posting style.
Both vote BNP.
Both have read the Koran, not the Qur’an, but the Koran.
Both have the exact same political view as the other.
Are you twins or maybe clones?
Here’s a few things that give it away beyond using the same IP for different names.
You used the same writing style, for example when asking a question as Jon/David both end the question with multiple question marks????? You both capitalise words within a sentence where a Capital letter really shouldn’t Be. I’m no expert on writing styles, but yours is very, very easy to spot.
Lets not waste any more time on this, you are one person, I don’t care if you admit it or not, if you post under the name David again I’ll add a moderator note or delete it.
David
View Comment
Removing Potter and a number of other BNP posters from this site will have no effect on the BNP. You can never silence the true feelings of the people of all creeds who live here in peace. I am not Racist as I have many Jewish and Sikh friends, is this hard to take on board David??? I love Life but I would love it better if I had not to think of Islam and Muslims living in my Country!
View Comment
How did I remove BNP commenter’s from the site?
This site is run by the software WordPress.
The comments are open, you don’t have to register to comment (anyone can comment).
There is no easy way to ban a person from posting.
The only way I can ban a person is if they use one IP address ONLY to access my site, I can ban them from my entire dedicated server and so far I’ve banned one person (Crispin for being homophobic comments). It’s a minority of commenter’s who use a static IP.
If a person has a dynamic IP address (their IP changes every time they log on) there is no way to ban them.
That means manually deleting comments one by one as they are posted.
Yes I delete some comments, for example when P0TTER made around 15 duplicate comments about removing the BNP from the poll I deleted them. Haven’t deleted his/her non SPAM comments though, examples:
The majority of BNP comments on the main general election poll page are deleted. There is a warning on that page that BNP comments are generally not welcome (let a small number through), but on the BNP pages, BNP supporters can comment.
If you don’t like the way I run this site, don’t visit it. As I’ve said many times I’d be a very happy man if BNP supporters would never comment on this site and yet I still tolerate BNP numpties like you and Potter who accuse me of ridiculous things like making all the anti-BNP comments under different names like Vote No To BNP.
I love this approach you are taking, can’t beat me in reasoned debate, so attack me on my moderating style.
Lets discuss the BNP national service policy that links the right to vote to military service. Not served in the military, whoops, you can’t vote M8!
Come on Jon, discuss this retarded BNP policy. Tell me why you think this would be good for the country?
David
View Comment
Not going to waste any more of my time on a moron like you. You have banned Potter and many more from using the site so tell the truth! I would love to use the words which describe you the best but not going to give you the satisfaction of deleting my post.
Jon
You are a lying BNP supporter and I hope you aren’t lying about not posting here anymore (won’t hold my breath though!).
I have banned one IP address from my dedicated server, period! If a BNP commenter like Potter or Terence (that guys an idiot) made a comment right now it would go through because after a comment is approved to a commenter’s email address they all go through (you appear to know Potter personally, if you know his/her email address try making a comment with it, it will go through) with the odd exception**.
** Sarah in the Desert for example has had a few comments automatically moderated as SPAM by a plugin called Akismet, the plugin made a mistake. It happens, the software isn’t perfect, but it was easily fixed, I manually recovered the comments.
If someone posts BNP SPAM like the last ones Potter made (15 almost identical comments) I’d have to manually delete them like the last lot Potter made. This is true of all commenter’s except Crispin who can’t access any of my sites via the static IP he posted here with (though he could get by the IP block by using a proxy server).
If I really wanted to fully control who was and who was not allowed to comment on my site I’d do what the BNP website does (it uses WordPress as well) and only allow registered users to comment. If I did this I could then easily ban users who didn’t stick to the commenting rules https://general-election-2010.co.uk/commenting-policy/
Sick to death of BNP conspiracists posting rubbish about me on my own website. If I wasn’t so tolerant I’d delete every last BNP comment and only allow comments from non BNP supporting commenter’s. The fact I’m allowing you to accuse me of this rubbish shows it’s rubbish (I could have deleted your comment you BNP moron).
David
View Comment
I am afraid David is so full of vitriolic hatred of the BNP and all those British/English people who support it that he has lost all sense of democracy and reason.
The people of this Country will vote for the party they wish, and David will have to accept that, even if he does not want to play by fair rules on his precious web pages.
He cannot change the outcome of the election itself, all he can do is bury his head in the sand and delude himself.
(Note to moderator, David, there is no need to reply, this post is not intended for you to read or answer, it is for Jon)
View Comment
And yet you still visit my site and post on it despite saying several times you won’t be posting anymore. A lot of BNP commenter’s say they hate me and my site and aren’t going to post anymore, shame they are a bunch of BNP liars who keep posting more and more comments!
BTW if you want to send Jon direct messages, why don’t you contact him via the BNP website: I’m sure you both comment there on a regular basis, bitching about how undemocratic I am :-)
Have a nice day.
David
View Comment
Not saying I hate you and your site David, I just hate the way you show lack of respect for fellow posters. One day you will take note about your lack of understanding and also the ill feeling you have for a Genuine Party which values the beliefs of all Cultures of people who live here in peace. You really know jack shit about the New BNP! I stand with open arms to welcome people of all cultures in my ward as long as they fit in with the rest of the peoples lives and customs. Islam and Muslims are and Never will be Welcome in my Ward! Why??? Because they want their own Schools, Laws, Doctors and every thing which is Islamic! More and more people are fed up with their 3rd World Stone Age Ways! The Majority of Muslims will never be Civilised or act Civilised.
Jon
View Comment
So much for “Not going to waste any more of my time on a moron like you.”, typical BNP temper tantrum when they don’t get their own way.
“Not saying I hate you and your site David, I just hate the way you show lack of respect for fellow posters.”
Respect works both ways Jon. Let me remind you of your earlier comments:
“I see that the BNP Votes have been removed. May be its because the person who began this Poll is scared of the results???”
“Bloody Childish! Get a life! Or better still Get a BRAIN!”
“Well there you go, I had to remove 800 Votes from the BNP, Just goes to show that the voting system here in the UK is a Joke! What a FIX! God this is SICK!”
“I think that David and the rest of the ANTI BNP people on here are the same person, they do come out with the same CR4P”
“You have left your self wide open to be ridiculed by me and other fellow posters.”
Where was your respect for me when you made posts like these?
And this from a possible BNP councillor, not exactly tolerant of others views!
“Just to let you know, I am standing as Councillor in my Ward and yes its for the BNP!!!
We need more people to STAND PROUD TOO!!!”
David
View Comment
This is how pathetic BNP Potter is, take a read of (you have to register to read it all as the BNP hide their main content from the general public):
This is a result of posting 15 almost identical “WHY HAVE YOU REDUCED THE POLL OF BNP VOTES” comments to this site within minutes of each other and a few to one of my other sites about conspiracy theories.
I deleted all the comments, because it’s been discussed at length at https://general-election-2010.co.uk/general-election-2010-have-your-say/ including https://general-election-2010.co.uk/general-election-2010-have-your-say/comment-page-4/#comment-4131 where the discussion is still open.
This is the exact email I sent Potter:
Note: threatened to ban Potter, didn’t actual ban the IP. If he/she does it again I will.
Basically another lying scumbag BNP supporter who lacks the skills to debate politics so resorts to BNP conspiracies, lies and mud slinging.
Absolutely pathetic excuse for a human being and that’s the sort of person that campaigns for the BNP!
David
View Comment
When someone spouts the word racist what do they mean by that term. Is it a claim that all races display and have the same attributes to each other in equal measure? The answer has to be no because that is simply not true. Races and peoples are different (which does not mean, overall, that one race is superior to another).
I do not believe that the BNP is racist (that does not mean that there are racists within their ranks). If a party wishes to preserve the indigenous population in terms of genetic stock and culture then that truly is a good thing. I will be voting for the BNP at the next election. What made me decide? Reading books: Race against time: racial heresies for the 21st century by j. Taylor et.al. and the Immigration Invasion by Arthur Kemp.
Plus articles on the web.
I will leave you my definition of what I believe constitutes a racist:
The belief that race is a primary determinant of human traits, and with that, the capacities and those racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a certain race.
I could go into more details but I believe that anybody who is racist (under what I have defined is racist) cannot produce a tenable argument to support their views. If the BNP don’t get in then this country will change – for what I believe to be – the worst. Balkanisation if you will.
View Comment
I think what we have to notice is that BNP support has risen over the past few years as the economy has dived. Basically this shows that as people feel times are tough and that they’re in difficult situations they turn to extremeties, e.g the BNP. The same thing happened in Germany causing Hitler to get into power, which is happening with the BNP, albeit on a very very very much smaller scale.
Thankfully as the economy gets better i’d not be surprised if BNP support starts to drop again. At the end of the day outside of Yorkshire and a few of the home counties, they have little/no real support anyway.
View Comment