Also see the BNP Manifesto 2010. The British National Party (BNP) is a far-right political party with strong racist and fascist roots. Formed as a splinter group from the racist/fascist National Front by John Tyndall in 1982. Until 2009, when the BNP was challenged in the courts on grounds of racial discrimination, it restricted membership […]
Continue Reading Reasons to Vote British National Party : BNP 2010 General Election
How many MPs do you think the BNP will have after the general election Jon?
Do you think it will be enough to form a government?
BTW any chance of sharing whatever you are on as I could do with a pick me up :-)
David
Two BNP conspiracies in one here.
Referring to Vote No To BNP as David, I assume you think we are one and the same person.
And postal votes are a conspiracy to keep the BNP out of power.
Is that the buzz of another BNP drone I hear :-)
David
Sheesh we have another Terence!
You haven’t explained a single reason to actually vote BNP, it’s all negative crap.
Do you support the BNPs policy to have everyone do national service and if a person doesn’t do military national service they can’t own a gun and loose the right to vote?
You either have to be an idiot or some extreme military nut like they have in the US to vote BNP knowing they will expect us all to have a gun and to have served in the military to vote!
David
View Comment
Well not only can’t you read simple instructions, you can’t do basic mathematics either.
Simple calculation, to form government the BNP needs to win over 300 seats. If they don’t field 300 candidates in the general election how could they win 300+ seats?
To have a serious chance of gaining power (forming the next government) they’d pretty much have to field candidates in almost all 650 constituencies to have any hope of winning 300+ seats. The BNP could not afford the £300,000 in fees (£500 per candidate last time I checked) to field that many candidates let alone pay for the election campaigning of 600+ candidates.
You too afraid of saying where you’ll be standing Jon, don’t like the idea we’ll be able to laugh at you after you’ve lost?
So much for standing up for what you believe in, he’s too afraid to put his name to his declaration he’ll be standing!
Where do the BNP dig up people like Jon from?
David
View Comment
If people like us are responsible for illegal wars etc… because we vote Labour/Conservative. By your argument you are guilty of holocaust denying since Nick Griffin was convicted of that crime. That also makes you a racist as many BNP candidates are guilty of racially motivated crimes.
You are one sick puppy Jon, shame on you for being a racist and an anti-semitic dick head by proxy.
David
View Comment
Cite your source. Nick Griffin has never Denied the Holocaust happened. He was never convicted or arrested for or of denying the holocaust for 2 simple reasons. One is he never denied the holocaust and, Two ‘Holocaust Denial’ would be insane and Definitely contrary to the evidence, and last but not least there is no such offence in UK law.
Do try not to repeat lies and inaccuracies published by others with out checking your facts. Being sued for libel can get expensive even though Nick Griffin, who’s mercy is boundless, will no doubt let you off as there is no credit in punishing a person under a disability. (a ‘person under a disability’ is a legal term look it up)
View Comment
Nick Griffin denies the holocaust on TV, his own word:
And
Nick Griffin denied the Holocaust in issue 12 of a publication called “The Rune” and that issue led to Griffin’s conviction in 1998 of distributing material likely to incite racial hatred.
He was given a nine-month prison sentence suspended for two years.
During the trial (at Harrow Crown Court in 1998 27th April to 1st May) he said:
It’s a fact he denied the holocaust and one of the times is on video.
If there’s no trial and he wasn’t found guilty why are the Crown Prosecution Service blocking freedom of information requests from the Guardian newspaper for a copy of the Griffin trial transcripts? https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/jan/22/nick-griffin-race-trial-details
Seriously, you can not deny Griffin denied the holocaust and received a 9 month suspended sentence for the crime of inciting racial hatred.
Now you might be able to argue he wasn’t convicted per se for holocaust denial, but holocaust denial was part of the case against him regarding inciting racial hatred and he was found guilty of inciting racial hatred (9 month sentence, suspended 2 years).
Semantics, but still.
BTW “person under a disability” very funny, I’ll have to remember that one :-)
David
View Comment
How would the BNP solve the problems we have in the country today?
How will they deal with our massive debt?
How will they generate more jobs?
How will they make Britain an attractive place for foreign investment?
How will they improve the NHS?
How will they deal with anti-social behaviour?
David
View Comment
David and VoteNo To BNP you are clearly deluded.
If you are going to make claims as to the intentions of the British National Party either now or in the future please provide citations or links to the sources of your information. The Citations of course must be to primary sources. Listing a source which itself does not cite a primary source is not evidence of truth of your statements. If you are unable to provide accurate and verifiable sources, we must assume the following; you are fabricating the information, you are a Sun or Mirror Reader (FLESCH KINCAID reading age 8/9) Incidentally the ONLY primary source of policy information or the intentions of the British National Party is, wait for it, … THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY. Not Searchlies, New Labour, The Conservative Party, The Liberal Democrats(?) or UAF et al. Only the BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY speaks for THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY and for the INDIGENOUS BRITISH PEOPLE.
View Comment
“Incidentally the ONLY primary source of policy information or the intentions of the British National Party is, wait for it, … THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY.”
Brian I refer to BNP policy documents all the time that’s where I get the vast majority of my arguments from. I’ve stopped linking to them as you lot don’t listen anyway.
Everything I’ve posted about the BNP’s national service plans are from BNP policy documents including their election manifestos.
I’ve been arguing with BNP numpties so long I’ve stopped linking to the same sources over and over again, but I have in earlier comments.
copied from an earlier comment:
If the loosing the right to vote under a BNP government isn’t true please explain what the BNP 2005 general election manifesto was referring to then?
Below is all references I could find to National Service policy in the 2005 BNP general election manifesto, I’ve bolded the loosing the right to vote bit, so you can’t miss it:
And from the more recent BNP Defence policy:
So National Service hasn’t been dropped from current BNP plans.
………………
I assumed anyone wanting to read the BNP 2005 general election manifesto would realise they can get it on the BNP website to confirm the accuracy of the above quotes, same for the recent BNP defence policy.
If you are referring to something in particular I’ve written about the BNP, feel free to state what and I’ll point you to the relevant BNP policy it’s based on.
David
View Comment
You support the BNP policy to remove the vote from people who don’t do military national service!
Very democratic of you Jon!
Vote BNP, but don’t expect to be able to vote against them in 2010 as you’ll loose your right to vote under the BNP!