Also see the BNP Manifesto 2010. The British National Party (BNP) is a far-right political party with strong racist and fascist roots. Formed as a splinter group from the racist/fascist National Front by John Tyndall in 1982. Until 2009, when the BNP was challenged in the courts on grounds of racial discrimination, it restricted membership […]
Continue Reading Reasons to Vote British National Party : BNP 2010 General Election
David
Let me get this straight
So without any knowledge about the BNP party, without even bothering to do a simple wiki search to learn about them…without even reading a paper…you decide to write the be all and end all of the party.
That is lame…..very very lame.
Most is speculation and even the true facts are written with malice. Fact is, if you dont know a subject, dont write rubbish. It makes you no better than a Sunday Sport columnist.
And BNP are NOT nazis. It is an insult to every British national to be called one. Hitler tried to invade here? Hitler was not British…I hate when people mix up their history
(psst…Martin Luthor King wasn’t a supporter of the KKK either before you ask)
Everyone else
Fact is a hell of a lot of people support the BNP. Last election 80% of all the people I know simply refused to vote (including myself).
However the parties you so love so much have lied to us for so many years people are getting fed up. You do not need a degree in politics to notice this.
All of those people who I said didn’t vote now vow to vote BNP. It may not be the same all across the county, but in areas where the ‘ethnic majorities’ spit at the whites (it does happen, I have experienced it myself first hand)…areas like these, BNP have huge support.
A lot of votes will go to the BNP in a bid to wake up the doddering pillocks who are clearly out of touch with the public.
Simples
DarkMithras (a guy who is fed up with it all)
View Comment
ROFLOL, did you actually read the whole Reasons to Vote British National Party article above?
Did you miss this little bit:
“Based on:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_National_Party”
Last time I checked using Wikipedia as a basis for an article would fall under a Wiki search.
I did this for all the parties I created a “Reason to Vote ### Party” page based on information from Wikipedia, I wasn’t looking to create a as you put it a “be all and end all of the (BNP) party” type article, just a bit of basic information for visitors to comment under and discuss their reasons for voting BNP.
Nice to see I’m being knocked for doing research now, sorry I’ll make it all up next time just like the majority of BNP supporters appear to do for their comments etc…
Your premise for your comment is also wrong. I’ve mentioned in other comments I didn’t know a great deal about the BNP when I created this website since my reasons for creating the site never included discussing the BNP. The sites over 6 months old now, do you seriously believe over the last 6 months I’ve not done a lot of research on the BNP?
My background is research, my current career is research based so I’m pretty good at researching information.
You say “Most is speculation and even the true facts are written with malice.”
At least you admit it’s factual. What’s speculation and I’ll be happy to do further research on those items?
David
View Comment
Could any BNP supporters explain to me the relationship (historical and present) of the BNP and terms like Combat 18 and 88?
For those not familiar with these terms:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combat_18
And 88
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/88_%28number%29
Why would a “Former BNP chief helps police crack secret codes of far right” as described in the article
Could someone explain past (clearly there are past links) and current links between the BNP and these terms?
David
View Comment
Ok heres one for you, the BNP complain so much about immigrants ripping off the benefits system, now here is a story from 2006 regarding a THE leader of the BNP group on Calderdale Council being found guilty of £3,000 of benefit fraud (gotta love the irony)
“THE leader of the BNP group on Calderdale Council has been found guilty of swindling taxpayers to line his own pocket.
Richard Mulhall was found guilty on four counts of benefit fraud at Teesside Crown Court.
But the benefit cheat has refused to quit as councillor for Illingworth and Mixenden, Halifax, telling the Courier he would not make any decision until after sentencing. He said he would be seeking legal advice on appeal.”
Source: https://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/mulhall-guilty-of-fiddling-163-3-000-from-taxpayer-1-1972629
View Comment
looks like the labour party has imploded- civil war in the party. the tory party keeps flym-flamming on its policies.the lib dems inconsequential? this only leaves one party to get britain out of trouble,the B.N.P.
“lib dems inconsequential?”
“this only leaves one party to get britain out of trouble,the B.N.P.”
mm lets have a look at this one shall we, well the LibDems currently have 62 MPs in parliment ok accepted fact? how many do the BNP have eerr oh yeah that’s right NONE, so who is inconsequential in reality then?
Lets look at another side of this point, the LibDems will be putting up candidates in pretty much ALL of the westminster seats in this years election (so they have plenty of chance to raise the number of MPs to a position of power)
The BNP are ONLY fielding around 200 candidates for the election which means even if everyone of them won (a seriously unlikely outcome if you take it from a view of reality) they still won’t have enough seats in parliment to be the Government.
So it seems the BNP are the ones that are of no real consequence in the eyes of the real voters of the UK in terms of who will be in ANY position to form any kind of Government.
View Comment
Lets imagine the above is true, exactly how are a couple of BNP MPs (see Roger Philips Wales BNP organiser stating a couple of BNPs is what they are hoping for in the comments on this site: so direct from the BNP, not me making it up) will result in:
“this only leaves one party to get britain out of trouble,the B.N.P.”
How are a couple of BNP MPs going to get Britain out of trouble after the general election???
Do BNP MPs have super powers or something?
Even if your BNP organisers are wrong and the BNP do go from 0.7% of the popular vote in 2005 to enough to gain lots of MPs, they are probably only going to contest ~200 parliamentary seats out of ~650.
Roger have the BNP decided on the number of seats they’ll be contesting yet?
If the BNP won all 200 (which will NEVER happen) they still couldn’t form a government. In your wildest dreams the BNP can only become an opposition party with ZERO power to enact BNP policy. Actually at best they’d form a coalition government with Labour or Conservatives and I have a feeling neither of those parties would ever form a government with the BNP (if they did I’d never vote for Labour again)!
I’ll add IF the BNP had the widespread British support they say they do, why did they only manage 2 MEPs in the EU elections (with 6.2% of the popular vote) which uses proportional representation to decide who becomes an MEP?
With proportional representation you don’t need to gain most votes to gain some power, in theory under our general election first past the post voting system a party could have 49% of the vote and gain no MPs, under the EU elections using PR, 49% would get a party roughly half the power.
Some of you BNP supporters should buy a copy of Politics for Dummies as you haven’t got a clue how the system works.
David
View Comment
DAVID,it is sad, that what has gone on in parlamentin the last 40 years.their are people like yourself who are still willing to vote for the liblabcons,when the country needs a radical party ;for radical change.
Nick Griffin is very wrong for being a rascist, however the BNP are the only political group who have a backbone, and will tackle the problem with the islamic extremist’s and make Britain British again and also a much safer Britain.
I am a retired Metropolitan Police Inspector with 30 years service.
I then went to work for Greenwich Council for seven years but was forced out of my job after reporting a Senior Manager for racist behaviour in the workplace.
Two of my six grandchildren are mixed race.
I was an athletics mentor to Stephen Lawrence and his younger brother Stuart for over four years when they were members of Cambridge Harriers Athletic Club.
I am the individual responsible for putting the Parliamentary expenses scandal in the public domain although you would not be aware of that because of a media blackout.
I have reported over twenty five Members of Parliament and Peers of the Realm to the Metropolitan Police and the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards for alleged criminal conduct and breach of Parliamentary rules.
These MPs include Derek Conway, Sir Nicholas and Ann Winterton, Michael Martin, Harry Cohen and six of the nine cases that have recently been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service.
You can verify by googling my name. (Michael Barnbrook)
Oh. I forgot to mention. I am also a PROUD member of the British National Party. Strange world, isn’t it?
View Comment
Welcome to my site Michael.
Got a couple of quick question for you, are the parents of your mixed race grandchildren current members of the BNP?
If not (or you’d rather not say) and assuming they both wanted to be members could they both have joined the BNP prior to your party being forced through the courts to change it’s membership rules?
David
View Comment
Hi there David,
Why not get straight to the point. Both my grandchildren have white mothers (My stepdaughters), both fathers are black and were born in this country. I don’t think any of them have any interest in joining any political party and have certainly not questioned my political affiliation. It is a bit unfair to say we were forced through the courts. There has only been one initial hearing so far which has been adjourned in order for members to be given the opportunity to vote for a change in the constitution. As we are not a racist party it is widely anticipated that the majority of the current membership will vote in favour of a change, so long as the core values of the party are protected. Many members, including myself, see the current membership criteria as a stumbling block to bigger and better successes for the British National Party. A change will allow anyone of good character to join, including all those individuals such as serving police officers, prison officers, teachers and the like, who so far, have been prohibited from doing so. We will drastically increase our membership and organisations such as Unite against Fascism, who promote violence against the British National Party and the Police and have fifty seven MPs amongst their membership, including David Cameron, will no longer have a drum to beat. I think there are exciting times ahead for the British people, more of whom will feel comfortable to vote for the only political party that truly represents the majority. May I take this opportunity to wish everyone who visits your site, a peaceful New Year.
View Comment
Michael would you mind if I ask a question here related to the Constitutional change topic.
I hear that the party AGM (if they are calling it that, can’t remember the exact term) to allow the members to vote on the issue is set for 31st January, yet the EHRC court appearance is set for 28th January – so how are the BNP intending to answer the question to the court relating to change when the membership won’t be allowed for vote un till a few days after the decission is being made in the courts?
(This info is based on stuff I have read on various websites including Stormfront) so not claiming it’s gospal hence asking the question.
View Comment
An addition here: was just doing some quick research to check my dates where correct (they are), there is a video on the website that says the BNP have conceeded the case?
Take a look and watch the video your opinion on what it says would be appreciated.
You must appreciate I am a member, not an officer of the party, so I am not privy to anything going on at that level. I cannot imagine that we would defy any instructions from the court so I can only imagine that our party has obtained a variation to the original order. As far as I know the vote will take place on 31st January, 2010. It is interesting to note that there was no good reason to take us to court. When Harriot Harman introduces her Equality Bill later this year we would have had to change our constitution anyway. The consensus of opinion is that the establishment took us to court in order to attempt to bankrupt us in the run up to the General Election. I know David thinks we are paranoid about conspiracy theories but it all seems a waste of time and our money for no good reason. Sorry my response is a bit vague but you appear to know more about my party than I do. Regards Mick Barnbrook
View Comment
Well the other bill aside the EHRC in many articles all over the web have stated that the BNP lost the case in court and were issued with the court order insisting on the change (from what I have read) and all the articles saying that Nick Griffin has agreed to obide with the court order (apparently).
So it does raise further questions in that the vote actually in reality means nothing as according to the court documents (available on the web) say that it has already been agreed to, and that the court date of the 28th is designed to have the “new constitution” approved as legal.
Other Stormfront forum posts I have read indicate that Nick Griffin (or the party lawyers) will appear on the 28th of January to ask for an extension to the date as they haven’t been able to get the vote of the main membership done in time for the hearing.
So it sounds all very contradictory to me, the BNP claim they haven’t lost the case, the EHRC and courts say they have – the BNP says it needs to ask it’s members yet according to the EHRC Nick Griffin has already agreed to make the changes to conform with the current law.
Can you see where the average Joe is comming from, conflicting stories, yet personally (as you may be expecting) I tend to believe the EHRC version as they are the body who bought the case in the first place.
So the vote on the 31st actually means nothing as Nick Griffin has already agreed to change the Constitution without the vote anyway.
View Comment
“Sorry my response is a bit vague but you appear to know more about my party than I do”
Just to add to this (as I forgot to mention it in the previous post), what I have written in these few posts I found on the good old land of Google in around 10 mins, so not that I know everything about the BNP just know how to use the right words in Google to get the info I want quickly.
However having said that is does suprise me that you as a supporter/member of the BNP would be aware of some of these important issues and be as informed if not more informed than me using Google for 10 mins is, sorry if that comes across as slightly insulting it wasn’t meant to be.
View Comment
I am an old man and notused to all these modern contraptions such as computers etc. When my wife goes away I panic because I don’t know how to use the cooker or washing machine. I just wish I was twenty years younger. Anyway it was enjoyable communicating with you. Take care.
Michael
So just to clarify you don’t want to (or can’t) actually answer the question I posed to you which was:
Due to the agreement from Nick Griffin to change the parties constitution (as detailed in the EHRC article referenced above), the vote taking place on the 31st of the parties eligable voting members is actually of no consequence as Nick Griffin has “already conceded and agreed to change the constitution anyway” as evidenced by the previous article and other information freely available on the net?
So one could therefore make the (in my opinion right assumption) that whatever the BNP say about it they have in effect lied to their own paying members as whatever way they vote it doesn’t matter as the changes will have to be made as per Nick Griffins prior agreement with the EHRC?
View Comment
And i’m sure that as your previous career (30 years) in the Police Service you know all to well that the body of evidence that I have shown does in fact point toward the BNP having lied to it’s membership?
Otherwise the EHRC and the courts have lied in all their statements regarding the case, so which one would you say in your professional (ex copper) mode is telling the truth?
View Comment
I wish I could respond to you by your name. I do not want to get into long drawn out arguements about who is lying and who is not lying. My only concern and that of most of the party members I know personally is that we vote for change. Then and only then can we destroy the arguement that we only represent white people. The British National Party constitution was set up to protect the ethnicity of the majority of individuals in this country, not to say we are superior or inferior to anybody else. We as a party believe that every race is entitled to protect its ethnicity. I was recently attacked by two young black youths with lumps of wood because I had put a leaflet through their front door. There was real hatred in their eyes. I was probably the first member of the British National Party they had ever met but because of what they had probably been told by others and the lies they had read about us in the press, they saw me as the enemy rather than had they known me someone who has fought against racism by anyone all his adult life. I do not intend to make any more comments about this subject as I am beginning to feel that I am trying to justify myself and my party when we have no need to. Please visit our website and you will read the truth about us.
View Comment
So you don’t want to give your personal professional opinion as an ex Police Inspector based on the evidence?
The BNP website isn’t exactly known for being the most reliable source of information (I look at it most days to see what funny stuff they come out with next)
But thanks anyway for showing you are pretty much as deluded as all the other BNP supporters who when provided with evidence refuse to acknowledge that the evidence points directly towards the BNP have clearly lied (according to the words spoken by the EHRC directly after the last court appearance).
With your references to the illuminati etc yet another conspiracy theory believer so the BNP looks like the ideal party for you to be a member of.
As for giving my name it isn’t something I will do now or well ever, as I have said before I have received MANY threats of violence (including an actual attack) from BNP members (obviously the BNP supporters here dismiss that as a lie which I guess you will as well) but my user name will stay the way it is now, I have no intention of the rather more shall we say violent side of the BNP supporters club trying again.
View Comment
I had no idea what your grand kids parentage is and it didn’t really matter to my point beyond what you’d already told us (mixed race was enough information).
My point was under current BNP membership rules members of your family are not allowed to join the BNP, I take it your grand kids parents and your grand kids are upstanding members of society, (you wouldn’t want them to take up the BNPs voluntary repatriation payment to leave the UK?) so I don’t understand why the BNP currently doesn’t want them as members?
I’m not sure how the current BNP membership rules work for mixed race British people, is it if they look white they can join or if they have non-caucasian ancestry they are not welcome? Seriously I don’t know.
I don’t think it is unfair to draw attention to it taking legal action before the BNP considered changing it’s rules on whites only membership. It’s a fact, had this been an initiative by Nick Griffin it would suggest the BNP is shedding it’s racist roots, as it is it’s been forced on the BNP.
The membership rules can’t change until current BNP members vote on the change of membership rules right? Does that mean the current BNP members could vote against a change and the current rules could remain?
The BNP under Nick Griffin is meant to be changing into a non-racist political party, as such this should have been one of the first things on the agenda IF they want to represent all hard working, law abiding British people no matter what the colour of their skins as their party name suggests. British is not synonymous with white and hasn’t been for quite sometime.
I would say a better name for the current BNP would be the WBNP, the White British National Party as that’s who they currently want to represent, what the BNP call the indigenous population (white people).
We could argue who the indigenous people are, how pure the white race is genetically (not very pure in 2010, I studied genetics at University BTW), but I think you’d have to be an idiot not to accept the majority of people in Britain today look white and so I have no problem calling them the indigenous population: Aborigines of Australia are not as genetically pure relative to 300 years ago, but they are still the indigenous population in 2010.
I’ve said before I don’t have a problem with the BNP only representing white British born people, why not, what’s wrong with that? I’m white, but I wouldn’t vote BNP because I don’t see the colour of my skin as a reason to vote for a political party. Labour are perceived as representing the working class and poor people, the Conservatives are perceived as representing business and the middle/upper classes. Although a political party should take everyone into account, they have to concentrate on a set of people as their core vote and I don’t have a problem with the BNP being a party to represent white British people.
All that being said it’s 2010 not 1910 and in this day and age we shouldn’t be looking at things from a race perspective. The BNP should have drawn a line under this years ago if they didn’t want to be perceived as a racist political party in the 21st century!
David
View Comment
David,
This is the first time I have ever posted comments on a site and I am beginning to regret it. It is too time consuming. When you talk about voluntary repatriation you tend to forget that there is a repatriation scheme run by Government. I think it is Section 29 of the Immigration Act, 1971. The concept that the British National Party wants to repatriate everyone who is not white is simply not true. If that was the case I would not only lose my grandchildren, but also my Doctor, Dentist, Hairdresser and the chap that sells me my cars. The only individuals we want to repatriate are illegal immigrants, bogus asylum seekers and foreign convicted criminals taking up space in our prisons. Everyone else, so long as they pay their taxes, uphold the law and identify with our traditions and culture are more than welcome to stay. It is true that we want to call a halt to further immigration, solely on the basis that we are one of the most densely populated countries in the world. We are not a racist party and do not consider ourselves to be superior or inferior to any other race. We are however, entitled to protect our ethnicity. The concept of the British National Party is based on the right to self determination. By virtue of that right, people freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. The Labour Party have attempted to destroy our right to self determination. Andrew Neather, a speech maker who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett stated that huge increases in immigration over the past decade were a deliberate attempt to engineer a more multicultural Britain. He said it was official Government policy and that there was a driving political purpose behind immigration policy. Ministers hoped to change the country radically and rub the right’s nose in diversity.You are also wrong to say that we only represent white people. Our elected representatives treat all their constituents equally, irrespective of their race, religion or colour of their skin. Unfortunately, most people’s perception of the British National Party is based solely on what they read in the national press. The National Union of Journalists, in their constitution, specifically instruct their members not to report on us in a positive manner. How many people were aware that it was me that started the whole expenses scandal that has caused Parliament so many problems. Many people join the British National Party because they are Eurosceptics. Other than UKIP there is no other party you can vote for. Why not join UKIP then I hear you say. I did and I was a Parliamentary Candidate in the 2005 elections but I left the party because of the corrupt behaviour of some of their members, including Tom Wise, MEP and Ashley Mote, MEP who were both sent to prison for fraud. I am now going off to have my dinner David. Take care. Michael
View Comment
“I am beginning to regret it. It is too time consuming.”
That’s something we can agree on Michael :-), about half a dozen of my websites are heavily commented and can easily consume your day keeping up with response if your not careful.
Anyway, I wasn’t familiar with Section 29 of the Immigration Act, 1971, so looked it up.
Page 32 of
This section refers to paying for the cost of travel, not a large repatriation grant as the BNP have in mind.
From BNP Immigration policy (got it on my site at
So it’s not what we have now removed at our cost. This is offering legal migrants who have settled in Britain being offered large amounts of cash (Denmark has a similar scheme and is apparently offering over £10,000 per person to repatriate), this could amount to over £50,000 for a medium size family which is far, far more than paying travel expenses.
I never suggested the BNP want to remove everyone not white, from the BNP Immigration policy:
Based on BNP immigration policy it’s some of the 3.7 million legal migrants listed above. I realise the BNP have moved on from their basic racist aims of removing blacks/Asians from Britain. Now it’s more about stopping the Islamification of Britain, I would assume the BNP repatriation scheme would be aimed at Muslims who have legally settled here.
This could potentially include your grandchildren if one of their parents isn’t British born and it will certainly cover many doctors, dentists and other professionals only a bunch of fools who don’t understand basic economics would want to get rid off!
The BNP isn’t clear on how deep they’d go with this policy, how many generations will this cover, at what point does a person become British according to the BNP and so welcome in Britain?
Looks like you didn’t know the full BNP immigration policy Michael.
David
View Comment
“I am the individual responsible for putting the Parliamentary expenses scandal in the public domain”
Just like to say if you are the person responsible for first highlighting MP expenses, well done it needed doing.
Unfortunately whatever you’ve achieved is going to be over shadowed by your membership and support of the BNP.
In another comment you mention your past support for UKIP followed by “I left the party because of the corrupt behaviour of some of their members”.
Corruption and criminal activities by the various British political parties has come up quite a bit on my site, if you do some very basic research you’ll find lists of criminal convictions for all the parties including the BNP (not seen one for the Greens mind you, though I’m sure there will be).
When looking at these lists you have to take into account the size of each political party, Labour, Conservative and Lib Dems contest all parliamentary seats (so over 650 potential MPs each) and have 10s of thousands of councillors.
With so many people involved there are bound to be bad apples amongst their ranks, I’ve seen BNP supporters argue the BNP in comparison are honest and trustworthy, but when you check their criminal convictions lists out they are no better than any of the other political parties.
When you take into account they stood for just 119 parliamentary seats in 2005 you’d expect the BNP criminals list to be at least 3 or 4 times smaller than the main parties lists and it isn’t.
I’ve not performed statistical analysis on the criminal lists, but a quick look through them gives the impression relatively speaking BNP potential MPs and councilors are more inclined to be involved in criminal activities than the other parties. I will add the main parties seem to have far more sex crimes listed than the BNP have!
The conclusion I draw from this is the BNP are no better than Labour, Conservatives and Lib Dems when it comes to convicted criminals within it’s party.
Not suggesting you should have stayed in UKIP, just pointing out that the perception the BNP are somehow more honest and trustworthy than the other political parties doesn’t hold water.
As an ex member of the police would you agree with my assessment “they are all as bad as one another” Michael?
David
View Comment
Michael are you standing as a BNP candidate at the next general election?
Been reading a few articles mentioning your name (Google :-)) and there’s speculation you’ll be standing, any chance of confirming it either way?
I was reading https://www.theguardian.com/news/blog/2008/jan/31/michaelwhitespoliticalblog78 which is the 4th result in Google for the Michael Barnbrook search.
Is this part of the article true:
You refused publicity?
David
View Comment
David,
That remark about not being interested in publicity was made about one hour after it had been revealed that Mr Conway had been suspended from the House for ten days. In fact, if you google Michael White, the political correspondent for the Guardian, you will see that he telephoned me later that week regarding the fact that I wasn’t all over the national press. The reason for that was beacause, although I had numerous requests to go on TV and radio, it was with the proviso that I was identified as a member of the British National Party and not as a former member of UKIP. The media refused to go along with it. Now that the whole issue has snowballed to the extent it has I would like all the publicity I can get for my party, but I am not naive enough to think that will ever happen. Who do you think was responsible for reporting Mr Ian Clement, former Deputy Mayor of London, to the police for criminal use of his corporate credit card and for which he was convicted at court for fraud? I’ll give you one guess. When you make comment that I probably don’t know the full immigration policy of my party you miss the point. No member of any political party agrees one hundred per cent with the manifesto of their party. How many members of the Conservative and Labour Parties agree with sending our troops to Afghanistan to be killed for no good reason? Not many I’m sure. I joined the British National Party because they want to leave the EU, the most corrupt organisation on God’s earth and run by unelected representatives. The party also want all our troops withdrawn from Afghanistan. They also want the reintroduction of capital punishment where the conviction is based on irrefutable evidence such as DNA evidence. They are good enough reasons for me being a member of the British National Party. When you talk about unsavoury behaviour within a political party, let me quote something from a recent newspaper article on Harriet Harmen. The article states ‘Harriet Harman, Minister for Women and Equality, who also sits on a Cabinet Committee on young people’s welfare and the person touted as possible successor to Gordon Brown has been exposed by the Daily Telegraph for her sickening views on child porn. The Daily Telegraph got their hands on documents showing that Harman called on Ministers to water down laws to protect children from sex perverts. She wanted to make sexually explicit images or films of children legal unless there was evidence that the subject had been harmed. When she made the official submission, she was a senior figure in a disgusting organisation that wanted the age of consent to be lowered to 14 and incest decriminalised. The group known as the National Council for Civil Liberties also defended self-confessed paedophiles in the press and allowed them to attend it’s meetings. Harman became legal officer for the NCCL, now known as Liberty. Another member of the NCCL at the time was former Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt who held the post of General Secretary. Among the groups affiliated to NCCL were the Paedophile Information Exchange and Paedophile Action for Liberation.’ With regard to my political aspirations. I will be standing as a prospective councillor in the East Wickham Ward in the London Borough of Bexley. I stood there in the last council election and reduced a massive Conservative majority to just eight votes. Bexley is the strongest Conservative Borough of the 32 Boroughs in London with 54 of the 63 councillors representing the Conservative Party. You can find the result of the Council Election on the website. It is anticipated that there will be a breakthrough by my party in the next council elections, so if you are a betting man I would put a few shillings on us. With regard to the General Election my position has not yet been decided. As I was partly responsible for the downfall of the previous Speaker of the House, Mr Michael Martin, MP, as a result of the Conway affair and my complaint against Mr Martin in relation to the ‘Air Miles’ fiasco I might ask to be considered for the Buckingham seat where I would be standing against the present Speaker of the House, John Bercow, MP and Nigel Farage, MEP, UKIP. Both have had bad publicity with regard to their expenses so it might prove very interesting for them to go up against the BNP Sleazebuster. Regards, Michael
View Comment
Michael, it was interesting to read your post on here, however I feel that despite your reports to the Police, little will come of any investigation! The Police “service”? CPS AND Judiciary are now so politicised as to be almost USELESS in protecting our country and its culture!
I too was a member of Her Majesties Colonial Police in Central Africa, My son was in HM’s Armed services, serving in Iraq & Kosovo and has lost several of his former colleagues in Iraq & Afghanistan! It makes me absolutely furious to see the way our country is being BETRAYED by its CURRENT politicians & the establishment! I know that the MAJORITY of BRITISH voters are fed up too and in many cases have STOPPED voting because they say, RIGHTLY, that the current MP’s will not do anything to change the situation! The two classic things being the ILLEGAL war in Iraq, and the COVERT POLICY of labour to flood Britain with immigrants! The vast majority too are increasingly worried by the rapidly increasing Islamlification of our country, the unelected power of the EU and pouring Billions of pounds into the bottomless pit that is the corrupt, overpopulated third world!
Any lib/lab/con politician or member of the establishment eg. Justice Trigger,who dares put his head over the parapet & question these suicidal policies is immediately branded “racist” etc by the liberal , marxist handwringers!
Not ONCE on this site have I read ANY of the anti BNP posters express any concerns on overpopulation, , the proven lies of this labour government or the wholesale waste of giving foriegn aid to corrupt third world leaders!
I continue to post here because, despite the owners anti BNP bias, we must educate the THINKING BRITISH voter with the TRUTH, that the BNP is the ONLY party that will represent the average British person’s hopes & aspirations!!
View Comment
I agree with everything you say. This is the first time that I have posted comments on a site. Hopefully the site has many visitors and when they see that we are not a bunch of racist thugs, but ordinary decent and in my case working class individuals who are only trying to save our country from the traitors that currently run the country and the traitors that will probably run the country after the next General Election, perhaps we might change a few minds. My family were all Dockers in the East End of London and everyone, including myself, voted Labour. The Labour Party heve let everybody down, especially the working classes and will pay the price for so doing. Every day I hear friends and colleagues ask “How could anyone still vote for the Labour Party after what they have done to our beloved country? The islamification of our country is not because the three main parties really care about Muslims, it is because they just want their votes. Once they have got them they will probably suffer the same fate as the working class have suffered under Labour. The Conservatives need about one million more votes than Labour to win the next election. There are approximately one million Muslim voters in this country. Why do you think the Conservative Party has set up local Muslim forums in many of the constituencies? You know it makes sense.
View Comment
The reason parties like the BNP are picking up in popularity is they have populist policies.
That means they are promising to do thing that the people of the UK want, where-as Lib-Lab-Con are all saying they will do things people DON’T want.
It’s not rocket science.
Lib-Lab-Con tell everyone they won’t the referendum that was originally promised on Europe. BNP says they will.
Lib-Lab-Con says they wont put any proper controls in place on immigration, BNP says they’ll shut the door and kick out all those who shouldn’t be here.
Lib-Lab-Con says they’ll continue with “diversification” and “multiculturalism”, BNP says they’ll give people the choice of integrating of leaving.
The UK is the most multicultural country on earth. Our traditions are made up of bit of other peoples traditions that we’ve knicked. Lib-Lab-Con have undertaken a massive experiment that involved FORCING new cultures on the people of the UK.
Eventually, there was always going to be a pushback against this experiment. Shouting the word “racist” at anyone who disagrees with it has worked to keep it running for over a decade, but now the UK population (black, white and brown) has had enough… the worm is turning.
People are at a point now where as much as they hate be associated with the BNP, they have just had enough of having multiculturalism rammed down their throats. Gordon Brown said in an interview that Britain was “going to become more multicultural” and “British people will just have to get used to it”. I’m pretty sure that the point of democracy was that British people get to decide what happens to them.
I think Gordon Brown’s understanding of democracy needs a lot to be desired, and come the next election, he’d going to get a huge shock.
I’m not a racist, but if voting BNP automatically makes me a racist, then OK, call me a racist.
And that’s what half the people in the UK may well be saying at the next election.
View Comment