Also see the BNP Manifesto 2010. The British National Party (BNP) is a far-right political party with strong racist and fascist roots. Formed as a splinter group from the racist/fascist National Front by John Tyndall in 1982. Until 2009, when the BNP was challenged in the courts on grounds of racial discrimination, it restricted membership […]
Continue Reading Reasons to Vote British National Party : BNP 2010 General Election
I think it’s note worthy to point that the BNP website has now changed the picture on their website that goes with the bombing attempt on Friday.
Earlier today (as I pointed out on this website) the BNP produced a picture of the offender (there supposed offender) which has now been replaced by a picture of a plane ( are the BNP admitting they published an incorrect picture?) or have they been forced to remove it? we will never know as the BNP will NEVER tell the truth.
View Comment
Although it is also worth noting that they still haven’t changed this comment
“The fact that the 23-year old Nigerian could have obtained a “student” visa despite being registered on an international terrorist suspect watch list, reveals the extent of Britain’s “open doors” immigration policy.”
Which STILL hasn’t been proven and according to all the other reports isn’t in fact the known facts of the case according to the US Security Services :)
So the BNP still maintain they are the only ones with the correct version of the story.
View Comment
More evidence the BNP article is wrong
Source:
“The U.S. government did create a file on Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab in the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment, the intelligence community’s main repository of information on known and suspected international terrorists, in November 2009, Reuters reported.
He was not put on the no-fly list because authorities couldn’t find enough negative information on him, a U.S. administration official said Saturday, according to Reuters.
“There was insufficient derogatory information available on the subject at that time,” the official said, according to Reuters.
“Thus, he was not watchlisted as of December 25, 2009.”
A senior administration official told Fox News that here are over 400,000 individuals in the Terrorist Screening Data Base (TSDB), the main identities database within the U.S. Government for international terrorism.”
View Comment
you miss the point . he was from here an enricher yet another one!! and he attempted to blow another plain out of the sky!! does not matter if you do not get the article rite the face is the lib/lab/con brought him or his family here,and there are lots more like him //hope you get hit not some one who doesn’t deserve it!you want it you have it! vote BNP
View Comment
Actually Terence you’ll find if you bother to read something other than the BNP website, he was here between 2005 and 2008 under a student visa (legally) living in a flat paid for by his father.
He left in 2008 after his visa ran out, he then tried to apply for another visa for a dodgy college at which point he was refused entry and also added to a British Watch list and therefore BANNED from entering the country.
So he hasn’t been here since 2008 because he was BANNED from the country, and they are the facts. So the British immigration policy and checking system in his case WORKED perfectly as he was identified as bogus and banned before he even got back in.
View Comment
“does not matter if you do not get the article rite”
Let me pull you up again Terence:
1. He didn’t have a British passport
2. Why do the BNP complain to the PCC then if people don’t get an article right? (if it isn’t important for them to get it right why is it so important people only print the BNPs “correct version”?
3. Again he was BANNED under the British System which means in his case the system worked PERFECTLY.
So going by your statement “does not matter if you do not get the article rite” the BNP have NO RIGHT to comaplain when a newspaper writes an article that isn’t exactly correct then? as according to you it doesn’t matter.
View Comment
I’ve just found another reason NOT to vote BNP in 2010, whilst watching BBC news in the early hours they have a feature on the UK space industry a UK company called EADS Atsrium which employees 4,000 across the UK.
It is involved world wide and more so with contracts across the EU that we would lose by not being part of the EU, this company is a massive player in the space industry that we would lose bu not being part of the EU.
We are a big player in certain technologies in the space sector that we would no longer be under the BNP. as we would effectively become outcasts under the protectionist state the BNP suggest we should run.
So a BNP Government will also bring the UK technology/space technology sector to it’s knees with the loss of another 4,000 jobs.
View Comment
So even in space you see BNP BNP BNP Lol,
Obsessive.
See a Doctor.
Vote BNP
Save Britain.
Sorry Andrew you have shown yourself to be a dick there really, any basic understanding of economics and you would understand the reason for that post you numpty.
The BNP brings a Protectionist Policy and a policy of leaving the EU with that comes loss of said contracts with the European Space Agency as oohh let me think we won’t be part of the EU any more so that means also not part of the European Space Agency which in turn means loss of contracts to this British Company, which in turn means loss of income, jobs etc.
Jesus wept if you don’t even have a basic understanding of minor details what chance do we have.
View Comment
Typical VoteNO, More demented ramblings. Best beg for some help from your pool of fools.
You really are a sad case.
Vote BNP
Save Britain
Well done Andrew you just keep sounding like a standard BNP supporter whilst everyone else who visits this site can see logical thought out pieces of writing and explanation and then get that followed up by a junk post from a STANDARD BNP DRONE type such as yourself.
I think when people read the style of posts they are far more likely to take the logical posts with some depth of detail,and explanation rather than the sad type stuff the BNP (not all I agree) put out, and see which way they will be encouraged to vote then.
Some how I don’t think people will suddenly think oohh I like seeing people calling other people names all the time I think I should vote BNP.
Somehow I don’t think the majority of the British voting public think that way do you ?
View Comment
VoteNo
you deserve no respect.
I have seen how you twist every pro BNP post and then spam it with multiple mindless replys, often to yourself.
Vote BNP
Save Britain
Andrew why don’t you try applying some logic and actual debate to your posts.
I think you are very aware that I couldn’t actually care less what pro-BNP people think of me anyway, but I think you need to stop being so concerned about me and be more concerned about the people that visit this website and read some of the comments.
Surely if you are such a supporter of the BNP you should be turning your attention to showing reasons why the BNP have polices to offer this country that would be of benefit to it.
And then when people (like me even) give an alternative view you should then be entering in to debate with them rather than slipping in to name calling etc, you won’t win voters over by just scream VOTE BNP Save Britain, it’s dull and doesn’t explain anything.
You spend to much of your time worrying about what I say rather than coming up with any rational counter argument you just offer up what can only be described as standard stuff that has no real impact on the average reader.
So maybe you should be less worried about trying to attack or “identify me” and concentrate on actually trying to convince people that the BNP policies will work.
View Comment
au contraire VoteNo,
I really dont care what you have to say, as I have said all I see you do is mindless spamming, cut/pasting and post stacking.
Vote BNP
Save Britain
Well obviously you are botthered Andrew otherwise you wouldn’t bother replying to my posts would you.
And you’ll find 95% of the stuff I write is actually my own words and not copied and pasted from crap sources.
When I paste in sources I credit them and add my own thoughts to them, you don’t seem to be able to do much but either role out the standard BNP stuff or quote the BNP website.
View Comment
I make no apologies for using the best source of political truth available, The BNP site!
https://bnp.org.uk/
I see all of your posts are rated in the negative so despite what you are trying to achive your mindless spamming tactics are being seen through by the majority of site visitors.
This is despite your begging for help on anti bnp sites.
Vote BNP
Save Britain
View Comment
And you who does not know how to spell hear/here, from your earlier thred. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Wat as spelin got ta do wiv anyting?
Make a strong argument against a persons arguments NOT their spelling abilities, if I pointed out every spelling mistake by BNP supporters it would double the comments on my site. But then that would make me as sad as you and incapable of forming a logical argument to show a commenter is wrong.
On one of my comments about the BNP leader I typed Nick Clegg (twice) instead of Nick Griffin, now that’s a spelling mistake that needs pointing out :-)
David
View Comment
Voteno – nice to see you are still here.
Unemployment, job losses? You talk as though there were never any job losses under Labour or Tory.
Talk about space, the current unemployment figures are ASTRONOMICAL!
And they have never been much better under the Tory either.
I doubt the BNP could do any worse.
We want our country back,
Vote BNP
View Comment
Well Rosie do some research in to what happens to countries under a Protectionist Economy and you’ll see that unemployment rises out of all proportion, taxes rise, income and export/import etc.
History shows Protectionism doesn’t work and causes far more damage that it solves.
“Protectionism is frequently criticized as harming the people it is meant to help. Nearly all mainstream economists instead support free trade.[1][4] Economic theory, under the principle of comparative advantage, shows that the gains from free trade outweigh any losses as free trade creates more jobs than it destroys because it allows countries to specialize in the production of goods and services in which they have a comparative advantage.[12] Protectionism results in deadweight loss; this loss to overall welfare gives no-one any benefit, unlike in a free market, where there is no such total loss. According to economist Stephen P. Magee, the benefits of free trade outweigh the losses by as much as 100 to 1.[13]
Most economists, including Nobel prize winners Milton Friedman and Paul Krugman, believe that free trade helps workers in developing countries, even though they are not subject to the stringent health and labour standards of developed countries. This is because “the growth of manufacturing — and of the myriad of other jobs that the new export sector creates — has a ripple effect throughout the economy” that creates competition among producers, lifting wages and living conditions.[14] Economists have suggested that those who support protectionism ostensibly to further the interests of third world workers are in fact being disingenuous, seeking only to protect jobs in developed countries.[15] Additionally, workers in the third world only accept jobs if they are the best on offer, as all mutually consensual exchanges must be of benefit to both sides, else they wouldn’t be entered into freely. That they accept low-paying jobs from first world companies shows that their other employment prospects are worse.
Alan Greenspan, former chair of the American Federal Reserve, has criticized protectionist proposals as leading “to an atrophy of our competitive ability. … If the protectionist route is followed, newer, more efficient industries will have less scope to expand, and overall output and economic welfare will suffer.”[16]
Protectionism has also been accused of being one of the major causes of war. Proponents of this theory point to the constant warfare in the 17th and 18th centuries among European countries whose governments were predominantly mercantilist and protectionist, the American Revolution, which came about primarily due to British tariffs and taxes, as well as the protective policies preceding both World War I and World War II. According to Frederic Bastiat, “When goods cannot cross borders, armies will.”
View Comment
Voteno, my comment was in reply to yours about space.
You seem blissfully unaware that our current unemployment is sky high.
You advocate more of the same??????
We want our country back,
Vote BNP
Our unemployment stands at 2.64 million, and in the last quarter JSA Claims dropped by 6,000.
What I am trying to get across here is that by adopting the BNP policy of Protectionism unemployment will rise as companies will leave this country for other EU countries to keep costs down.
For instance the company I work for employs 5,000 British people in the UK and is part of a multinational company with offices world wide.
Our management team have clearly said should the BNP win any General Election that under their policies of Protectionism the rise in Export/Import taxes and the other Transport Tax that the BNP will bring in will make it economically un viable for the company to keep the UK operation open and they will therefore close it down and move the jobs to other offices in Europe to keep the business viable.
My job with the company means I have contact with very large companies across the UK who between them employ almost 1 million people have said VERY similar things that a BNP Government would ruin business and make them unable to compete in the wider world market and they would also have to consider moving operations outside the UK therefore putting another potential 1 million jobs at risk.
Protectionism (which is the BNP Economic Plan) will destroy this countries biggest employers who will simply abandon the country for another country where they can continue to be profitable.
View Comment
VoteNo,
Years ago, way back when we had a referendum on the Common Market, as was, my employers said much the same as yours say about the BNP, only in reverse.
We were all encouraged to vote for the Common Market, or we would lose our jobs because the firm would leave UK for overseas.
It seems to be common practice to threaten employees in this manner.
As it turned out, we voted ‘yes’ as requested, we joined the Common Market, as desired, and my firm promptly relocated to Singapore.
The moral is, don’t trust international companies, whatever they say. They don’t give a stuff for their employees.
Britain is no longer what it was then, it has degenerated to the point where it is no longer the same country – we are now ruled by Europe to the extent that it is hardly worthwhile voting in British elections, Tory or Labour or Libdem, all mean the same thing EUROPE.
To me living in modern Britain is like living in a foreign land. I want my country back, and the only way I can get it back, is to vote BNP.
We want our country back,
Vote BNP.
View Comment
The difference here Rosie is I am a senior manager at the company so I am well aware of exactly what will happen, as I know the way the company operates and what effect changes in Import/Export duties and what inpact the new Transportation tax will have on the profit margins.
We already run at minimal margins to remain competitive so the introduction of this Transport Tax will have a heavy impact on the profit margins, and simply make the operation far less viable and make far more business sense to move outside of the UK.
Now in my position I have safe in my job as I will automatically go with the company to where ever they relocate (if I want to), but there are 4,500 people that don’t have that security.
View Comment
Hi Ya Rosie,
Nice to see you back,
Hope you and family had a great Christmas,
Best wishes for the New Year!
Hi Andrew,
Nice to be back.
We had a very good Christmas, thank you.
Hope you had the same.
I discovered that the number of Christians likely to vote BNP is larger than at first thought. Just between you and me, there are millions of them.
Of the total of Christian non-voters in previous elections, a large majority intend voting this time, – all fed up with the immorality and Islamic invasion, they are intending to vote BNP. This confidential info came from a Christian friend on the email network.
Be sure to keep it to yourself now!
Love Rosie.
We want our country back –
Vote BNP
View Comment
under the lib/lab/con most of the space technology has been shipped yo India where they have a space program that should have been built here but our taxes have funded this in India depriving us of thousands of jobs in Britain , over the years we have klost through lib/lab/con policy millions of jobs in mines .docks/factories .fishing being in the E>U costs us thousands more jobs with Poles etc taking our work that is a fact! when Turky enters the E?U millions more will be chasing fewer jobs! people will be begging for employment!!We must get out of the E>U now VOTE BNP
View Comment
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8431749.stm
looks like Howard the coward is starting to bottle it! fear fear fear the BNP is near!! why is he so afraid of a little party. of no significance As DAVID and Vote no would have you believe/It cannot be racism or BNP policy as these people believe we don’t have any and all Howard and his ilk care for is money/ the BNP is on the rise on ward and upward
View Comment
WHY I VOTED FOR THE BNP
MARK DAY, TEIGNMOUTH
I’ve never voted in the past, but I wanted to vote now.
I decided to vote for the BNP because I like what they are saying. They have an opinion and I want them to be heard.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8089142.stm
Vote BNP
Save Britain
And why can’t you make a post written with logic and real thought rather than just copying and pasting other peoples reasons?
My God “vntbnp”, you have the sheer affrontery to dare complain when someone is cutting & pasting when you are the worst person I have ever seen to do it yourself, straight from the uaf website! I had wondered if there was someone with an iota of common sense behind the ludicrous pseudonym, but as I suspected all along you are just a lackey of the criminals in westminster, probably paid to smear anyone who looks like upsetting their gravy train, especially the BNP, who are more & more representing the views of the ORDINARY BRITISH VOTER and now are gaining more credibility as more people see through the continuing criminal lies & corruption of lib/lab/con traitors!
Your so called arguments on the numbers of immigrants after decades of unchecked immigration, your pathetic attempt at saying that the death penalty doesnt deter murder, your stupid claims that we are not being taken over and milked by the unelected EU, that we have to pay billions more pounds into the corrupt overpopulated third world, that we have to send more of our troops to be killed in unwanted wars in Iraq & Afghanistan. Your ludicrous defence of the greedy self seeking muslim parasite, Asghar in Wales, are all shown be be the desperate attempts of a FULL TIME political agitator trying to defend the indefensible!
View Comment
Ok Williams, lets see your own ability to write explanations then shall we:
1. Were is the evidence that the Death Penalty would reduce serious crime?
2. Where is your evidence that the BNP’s protectionist economic policy will benefit this country?
3. Where is your evidence that ANY political party pays people to rubbish the BNP?
All I have EVER seen you do is write rubbish that basically attempts to connect people to being paid by either the Government or other parties to trash the BNP, now you to me are just another conspiracy theory junkie who has nothing else to offer other than to attempt to blame everyone else whilst not even defending your own chosen party in your own words.
You are more than happy to repeat the same statements (normally from the BNP website) yet you can’t seem to be able to write your own explanations of much.
So rather than just trying to make the same old comments try doing/writing something that would convince me that the BNP are even worth considering let alone voting for.
Defend Nick Griffin as a serious politician (by trying to justify he varied past), try defending someone like Lee Barnes, or even Arthur Kemp who both has such dodgy histories they are great reasons for people not to vote BNP.
Can you actually do that without just repeating the same stuff you constantly repeat.
View Comment
Read my posts, get out of your blinkered existence, continually defending the indefensible, look around at the state Britain is in or continue to rant, you inadequate little creature!
Were you bullied at school, did someone in your family abuse you as a child?
If you are in such denial of the TRUE state of affairs in BRITAIN you need psychiatric help!
Of course if, as I and many others suspect, you have your snout well & truly in the trough with the other lib/lab/con criminals, it is a reason. But remember the chickens will come home to roost, sooner than you think and your cosy existence will come to an end!
View Comment
Like I said let’s hear your deffence of
1. Nick Griffin
2. Mark Collette
3. Lee Barnes
4. Artur Kemp
All BNP officials all with dubious histories that don’t sit well with the general public, lets hear some of you guys defend them.
I believe it is important to listen to public opinion of which my post is an example.
Again VoteNO, you expose the blind ignorance in yourself.
Vote BNP
Save Britain
I received this from the email network, I have passed it on, and hereby pass it on to any Christians visiting this forum.
————————————
Why shouldn’t Christians vote for the BNP?
Before deciding which party to vote for in the 2010 General Election, as Christians, our priority must be to carefully weigh-up which of the parties will do the most to protect our freedom to practice our Christian faith. If this is not your priority then read no further.
View Comment
And just how do I link to an email???
Love the way you delete pro BNP comments.
This forum is rigged.
Bye bye for good,
VOTE BNP.
“And just how do I link to an email???”
Erm, do what I did and find it on a website or post it on a pro BNP Facebook group and them link to it from your comment.
All these large articles posted as comments are causing pages to load really slowly and there’s search engine optimisation reasons for me not letting people post articles in full as comments (search Google Duplicate Content Penalty).
“Love the way you delete pro BNP comments.”
Actually I’m editing both pro BNP and anti-BNP comments. Few are getting deleted so far, if commenter’s continue to post full articles I’ll delete them as it takes ages for me to find the links to attribute them.
Is it really too much to ask to only put the parts of an article that is relevant to your argument and link to the main article for anyone who wants to rad it in full? If a whole article is your argument, link to it.
“This forum is rigged.”
This isn’t a forum, it’s a WordPress blog, it’s not really designed to work as a full blown forum, it’s meant for reasonable size comments and even then struggles in a situation like this with threaded comments having loads of responses! Because of the threading a page can have thousands of comments! I have it set for 25 comments, but WordPress only considers the first comment in a thread as a comment to count, so it’s actually 25 comment threads!!!
I’ve installed proper forum software at https://general-election-2010.co.uk/politics/ so visitors can post large original articles without the restraints of commenting on an over commented set of articles here.
And yes it is rigged, I don’t want ONLY BNP discussions. Though on this page it’s for discussing the BNP, so post away.
“Bye bye for good,”
Cya
David
View Comment
David,
I got the posting via email, from a Christian friend, and I had no reason to do a search to find the source.
I wonder why you took the time and trouble to track down the original source, just so you could delete it from your page when there are much longer postings from others.
I call that paranoid.
Fortunately this ‘forum’ or blog or whatever you decide to call it next, is not going to change the outcome of the next election, so it is of no significance in the grand scheme of things.
I also note your unsubstantiated insistence that the BNP subscribes to ‘conspiracy theory’ ; such as the UAF which we all know is just imagination, and the imaginary influx of Islamic immigrants, and the imaginary subjugation of Britain to the EU, and the imaginary hatred of this moderator for all things BNP.
The moderator is also noted for his vitriolic insults and offensive remarks, and distinct lack of rational argument whenever the subject of the BNP arises.
Although I have at times felt some degree of friendship with some of the other posters on this ‘blog’ (not a forum anymore) and have enjoyed my time here, I now think it is time to admit that my husband is right. There is no point to this ‘not-a-forum’ anymore.
People like the moderator, and others in this country who support the mainstream, richly deserve what they are voting for –
Rocketing unemployment, ruination of the economy, overpopulation, loss of sovereignty, Islamification, loss of identity, destruction of morality, and the end of Britain as a nation.
Let us pray that the country as a whole rejects the paranoia exhibited by our moderator and votes for the only party that can save Britain.
Farewell to all my friends here,
Happy new year,
Rosie.G
Vote BNP.
View Comment
If I was out to get you or something I’d have deleted the entire comment, seriously with almost 3,000 comments I doubt anyone would have noticed this one comment being deleted.
No instead I went to a fair amount of effort to find a source for the article and post a link to it so nothing would be lost. Would have been far easier just to delete it, but I’m trying to be reasonable!
Within the next few days I hope to do similar with the vast majority of old comments, I’m sure I’ll miss some, but my plan is to edit all copy and pasted articles to speed up page loading times and prevent Google duplication penalties.
Why does the article need to be posted on this site as a comment and at the original authors site as an actual article, which I’ll add has comments?
Does it not make sense to post an excerpt of the article and link to the original where anyone interested in Christian BNP stuff can read the entire article AND read comments (2 pages of comments) about it? I’ve done a better job of promoting this article than you have!
If this was me creating a new post for commenting on, yes maybe I’d post the full thing (assuming no copyright issues), but this is a comment on an existing article.
Regarding “when there are much longer postings from others.”
I was working through the comments looking for pasted articles and this one came up. So far I’ve gone through around the oldest 1,500 comments posted and probably 100 or so more recent ones. About half way through the task. Sooner visitors stop posting full articles as comments less work I have to do!
I’ve edited comments from both pro and anti BNP supporters whilst trying to attribute anything I delete. If I can’t find a source a few times I’ve deleted the entire comment if nothing else was added by the commenter.
Have a safe New Year.
David
View Comment
Tory Labour Lib/Policies SUCCESS and failure
Immigration / FAIL/ Open boarders no real control
Education / FAIL/ white Boys failing EDUCATION IN A MESS
Economy /FAIL/ bankrupt NATIONAL DEBT CLIMBING AT AROUND £6000 A MINUTE. No way to stop it, we make little have only infrastructure to sell when that’s gone its gone!!
Housing / Fail/ property devalued
Houses to immigrants before indigenous people gov have admitted this
Investment in British industry // FAIL
Railways and transport/ FAIL
SECURITY/ FAIL 7.7 and Glasgow
REAL JOBS CREATING WEALTH FOR NATION AND WORKERS / FAIL
ECONOMY /FAIL
ARMED FORCES /FAIL
FISHING INDUSTRY / FAIL
DOCKS SHIPBUILDING / FAIL
MINES COAL /FAIL
ENERGY POWER STATIONS/ FAIL
WEALTH OF NATION/ FAIL
PENSIONS/ FAIL
HEALTH SERVICE/FAIL
PAYRISES FOR WORKERS /FAIL
PAYRISES FOR GOV MINISTERS /SUCCESS
BAIL OUT BANKSTERS /SUCCESS
DEVALUE THE POUND TO TAKE US INTO THE E/U/ SUCCESS
OBCENCE AMOUNTS OF MONEY TO BE MADE BY THE UPPER CRUST /SUCCESS
DESTRUCTION OF THE BRITISH NATION IDENTITY 50/50
OVER SEAS AID /SUCCESS
POCKETING EXPENSES /SUCCESS
FOREIGN POLICY /FAIL. APROX; 2000-SERBS -80.000 IRAQIS. OVER 200 OF OUR SOLDIERS KILLED HUNDREDS MAIMED IN ILLEGAL WARS
LIES/SUCCESS =WAR/REFERENDUM ON E/U-
SOCIAL SERVICES /FAIL BABY P. (EXAMPLE)
RACE POLICY /FAIL
LAW ORDER AND CRIME,JUSTICE/FAIL gun knife drug crime out of control
MULTICULTURAL FORCED INTEGRATION /FAIL
TRANSPORT/FAIL
EMPLOYMENT/ FAIL AFTER THE ELECTIONS WHEN THEY CANNOT BORROW ANYMORE MONEY TO PAY OFF THE INTETREST ON LOANS&INTEREST RATES RISE over 3 million will be unemployed
View Comment
I note the uaf idiot “vntbnp” has changed his avatar in a desperate attempt to appear patriotic!
It wont work, anyone who supports the continuing destruction of Britain can only be regarded as a TRAITOR!!
pmsl I thought that would be the reaction I would get, nothing constructive at all just TRAITOR lol damn that made me laugh
“nyone who supports the continuing destruction of Britain can only be regarded as a TRAITOR!! ”
And by this comment I take it you are in fact saying that anyone who doesn’t vote for the BNP are then TRAITORS to Britain then?
If you are you’ve just put of another few thousand voters who i’m sure love being called traitors by supporters of a party with leadership and high ranking members who clearly admire Hitler :)
I’m sure people love being called a TRAITOR by people supporting a party that likes having the likes of David Lucas amongst in list of candidates.
View Comment
As the BNP are making claims that David Cameron has “admitted” that that the LibDems/Labour & Tories are the same, here is the actual broadcast where he says something very different have a listen for yourself.
He Actually Said “All Parties Have Something In Common We Are All In This To Create A Fairer, Greener and Safer Briton. It’s Just That The Means To Achieve That Where We Differ”
So you’ll not he said “ALL PARTIES” and Not the LibDems and Labour.
So to kick out the story with the real words for you, have a watch and listen for yourself.
View Comment
Tory Labour Lib/Policies SUCCESS and failure
Immigration / FAIL/ Open boarders no real control
Education / FAIL/ white Boys failing EDUCATION IN A MESS
Economy /FAIL/ bankrupt NATIONAL DEBT CLIMBING AT AROUND £6000 A MINUTE. No way to stop it, we make little have only infrastructure to sell when that’s gone its gone!!
Housing / Fail/ property devalued
Houses to immigrants before indigenous people gov have admitted this
Investment in British industry // FAIL
Railways and transport/ FAIL
SECURITY/ FAIL 7.7 and Glasgow
REAL JOBS CREATING WEALTH FOR NATION AND WORKERS / FAIL
ECONOMY /FAIL
ARMED FORCES /FAIL
FISHING INDUSTRY / FAIL
DOCKS SHIPBUILDING / FAIL
MINES COAL /FAIL
ENERGY POWER STATIONS/ FAIL
WEALTH OF NATION/ FAIL
PENSIONS/ FAIL
HEALTH SERVICE/FAIL
PAY RISES FOR WORKERS /FAIL
PAY RISES FOR GOV MINISTERS /SUCCESS
BAIL OUT BANKSTERS /SUCCESS
DEVALUE THE POUND TO TAKE US INTO THE E/U/ SUCCESS
OBSCENE AMOUNTS OF MONEY TO BE MADE BY THE UPPER CRUST /SUCCESS
DESTRUCTION OF THE BRITISH NATION IDENTITY 50/50
OVER SEAS AID /SUCCESS
POCKETING EXPENSES /SUCCESS
FOREIGN POLICY /FAIL. APROX; 2000-SERBS -80.000 IRAQIS. OVER 200 OF OUR SOLDIERS KILLED HUNDREDS MAIMED IN ILLEGAL WARS
LIES/SUCCESS =WAR/REFERENDUM ON E/U-
SOCIAL SERVICES /FAIL BABY P. (EXAMPLE)
RACE POLICY /FAIL
LAW ORDER AND CRIME,JUSTICE/FAIL
MULTICULTURAL FORCED INTEGRATION /FAIL
TRANSPORT/FAIL
EMPLOYMENT/ FAIL AFTER THE ELECTIONS WHEN THEY CANNOT BORROW ANYMORE MONEY TO PAY OFF THE INTEREST ON LOANS&INTEREST RATES RISE over 3 million will be unemployed
must be lots more people can add to this horror
View Comment