The BNP and the woman in the video has used half truths

Comment on Reasons to Vote British National Party by David.

The BNP and the woman in the video has used half truths to discredit the post master, this is wrong, the BNP/woman are at fault here, not the post master.

If the BNP did not print a retraction of the story I consider them low life’s, they have and continue to damage an innocent businessman’s reputation and business and should be ashamed!

The most important points are.

1. The reason for the ban?

Was it because she is white?

Highly unlikely since there’s no other reports of white people banned, so this is not racism. There’s evidence (see below link) that the post master has been serving the woman for at least a few months, if he was racist, why now and not the first time she used his businesses?

Was it because her son was in a war the post master disagreed with?

From the evidence it would appear not, the post master has a history with this woman regarding a newspaper complaint about money.

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/shoppers-left-out-pocket-blunder-2100711

Because of a glitch at a Nisa store in Cardiff, as many as 400 debit card transactions did not go through properly.

So customers who thought they had already paid could now have money taken from their accounts for things they bought months ago.

Single mum Maria Davies found herself £200 poorer when money was taken from her last week.

It goes on to say

“Nisa-Today’s is very sorry for the problems this has caused and is aware that a number of customers have incurred overdraft charges from their banks due to this error. We will refund any customers’ charges for having insufficient funds in their accounts as a direct result of this error, on provision of details to the store.”

Mistakes happen in business, I should know I run one, but the important thing is they did the right thing and she got her money back and bank charges paid for. Assuming the newspaper report is accurate of course.

In conclusion the ban was not as the woman/BNP say on the video because she was posting parcels to a soldier in Afghanistan. It was because she was abusive to the staff (including an English woman) of his businesses.

Business owners ban people all the time from their places of work, that’s their right. If she felt the ban was unfair she should have gone to the Post Office and complained, if the complaint was upheld maybe the post master would have lost his contract with the Post Office.

Did she make such a complaint? It would appear not.

Those on this site supporting the BNP and arguing the video is factual even when the BNP themselves have removed the original article from their website are perpetuating the believe both the BNP and their supporters are low life scum bags who make up claims of racial abuse on white people to stir up racial hatred for political gains.

If you had any sense you’d accept the facts and move on, you are not helping your cause.

This is bordering on religious dogma, the BNP says “X” so “X” must be true! At best the BNP have screwed up royally, at worst they are fabricating stories for political gains!

David