OK David, you are more rational than Simon, let us look at

Comment on Reasons to Vote British National Party by G.Curtis & Rosie.G.

OK David, you are more rational than Simon, let us look at the cold hard facts.

a) Money was lost, reported as fact.
b) A ban was imposed, reported as fact.
c) The woman put her story and her face on the internet, seen by many.
d) The postmaster defends himself via a solicitor, reported as fact.

Statements made that are at variance —-.

“The allegation is false and malicious and related to a separate dispute with a customer.”
Note, it is not stated what this other dispute was about.

“As a result that customer is not welcome at these premises but our services can be accessed by someone else on their behalf if they so wish.”
——————————————
Here we have a post-master who presides over the loss of customers money, (There was a promise to repay, but was it paid back? Nobody said!)
He bans a woman, but so far his reasons have not been clearly stated.

The customer complains on Video, which takes courage, that the ban was because of her son.

***SO THE ONLY THING IN DISPUTE IS THE POSTMASTER’S MOTIVE FOR THE BAN***

1)The woman gave her belief that the reason was due to her son fighting etc.
The postmaster claims it was for ‘some other dispute’ but doesn’t say what.

2)The woman shows courage and determination by putting her face and her name and her story on the line and on the internet.

3)The postmaster is ambiguous about his reasons for the ban, stays in the shadows, and hides his face behind a solicitor.

So, nothing can be proved either way, because it is a matter of the postmaster’s motivation, and short of obtaining a confession we will never know his true reasons.

However, because the BNP are involved, trying to help the woman, PARANOIA and prejudice sets in.

Simon foams at the lips, keyboard on fire, threatens all sorts of dire consequences.
What has it got to do with Simon? Nothing at all, he just hates the BNP.
What has it got to do with David? Nothing, apart from the fact that he is moderator for this site, and is therefore responsible in some way for its content, but he also hates the BNP.

Rather than accept the story as he himself tells it, Simon claims it is ‘fabricated’, made up by the BNP.
The BNP should take HIM to court for defamation.