BNP Supporters couldn’t form a valid argument to save their life. Is

Comment on Reasons to Vote British National Party by David.

BNP Supporters couldn’t form a valid argument to save their life. Is that the best argument you can come up with, Wikipedia isn’t 100% reliable source of information, seriously???

Note the article was BASED on the BNP Wikipedia entry, not a copy of the BNP Wikipedia entry. I also confirmed what I wrote from places like BNP manifestos.

Please, feel free to point out what I got wrong? I’m quite happy to change things if I made an error in my research (prove me wrong).

BTW your argument I can’t debate about the BNP without first “contact your local BNP representative and talk to him/her and attend their meetings”. Well dumb argument (nothing new there from a BNP supporter) by the same argument you can’t discuss “lefties/communists/new conservatives/” as you haven’t met them all.

More double standards, the BNP supporter can discuss anything he/she wants about politics, but I can’t discuss the BNP without first jumping through a few retarded BNP hoops to qualify my arguments with drivel from a local BNP representative first.

Would discussing BNP policies with people like Michael Barnbrook (BNP candidate) and Roger Phillips (Wales BNP Organiser) count? Neither of them did a particularly good job arguing for the BNP cause in the comments on my site. Michael Barnbrook for example refused to discuss the BNP policy of military national service or loose your right to vote. Notice you won’t discuss it either, why is that, do you not want to have to own a gun and do military service to keep your vote?

At least from your last comment you confirm the BNP think pretty much everything is a conspiracy theory.

Regarding BNP members money wasted on court cases the BNP couldn’t possibly win, which is great as it means the BNP have no money to campaign at the general election.

The BNP membership policy of white’s only membership is illegal in this country.

That’s a fact (care to argue that fact?).

They didn’t have a cat in hells chance of winning that court case (which is why they lost) and so they wasted their members money fighting a case they could not win.

Not only that they showed that deep down the BNP have not changed, we live in a multicultural Britain, not pre 1950’s white Britain. The BNP now say they are no longer against hard working black British people, but fought in the court to deny them entry into the BNP as members. Why?

Add to this the money wasted not following the courts directions, something like £12,000 was wasted in one day because the BNP didn’t have the white’s only membership policy changed before the end of February 2010 and so the court had to give them more time which meant the BNP had to pay court costs.

£12,000 would be 24 BNP candidates deposit paid. On the BNP site under news they publish BNP fund raising events as awesome when they raise a few hundred quid. They could have had 24 more candidates at the next general election had the BNP organised a simple members vote a few weeks earlier than they did (they had months to organise it). I bet with the money they wasted on that one court case the BNP could have fielded another 100+ candidates at the general election instead of the 200 candidates they said thy will filed (there are 650 seats, the BNP will apparently contest only 200).

To Vote No To BNP (our resident BNP expert who I’m sure will read this :-)) do you know roughly how much the BNP wasted in total on that one court case?

I can not get over how politically and financially incompetent they are, it’s hilarious. The BNP do more damage to their own cause than every single UAF activist put together.

I look forward to Ys To BNP proving me wrong and arguing what parts of my article is not accurate/truthful. I won’t hold my breath though :-)

David