“IMO the reason why some (so not all) BNP supporters keep bring

Comment on Reasons to Vote British National Party by VoteNo ToBNP.

“IMO the reason why some (so not all) BNP supporters keep bring Vote No To BNP’s posting name up (it’s come up a fair number of times) is they can’t handle him in reasoned debate. They’d find something else to complain about if he posted under a name like Bob as well: UAF troll, paid by the Tories, he’s a Marxist Commie Fascist :-), he’s me, I’m him, he’s a fully paid up member of the NWO and Common Purpose secret society, wink, wink funny handshake…..”

I couldn’t agree more David, but I think the real issue is simply because I do post rather a lot of comments the BNP supporters are worried that the more the name Vote No To BNP appears the more people will (rightly) assume this site isn’t a pro-BNP website and therefore won’t be read there comments (which we know by the standard of the comments are generally all the same style of post, and it’s this general style of posting that the BNP supporters assume will win them votes).

I again do not attribute this to ALL BNP Supporters I also agree that there are the odd few that have excellent debating abilities and I actually enjoy debating with them.

But you are correct in saying that what I see as the average BNP supporter doesn’t have that ability and resorts to attacking on basic name calling and then complaining about my user name, which in my opinion is simply designed to get you (David) to ban me from the site, therefore leaving it open to the BNP to basically be able to comment how ever they like with only you and the odd other poster to say anything to counter their arguments.

Not wishing to blow my own trumpet so to speak (in fact I think this will be the first time I have ever said this), but it can’t remember a time where (on this site) I have lost any particular debate, because I am prepared to do the research and find the evidence to back up the majority of my claims.

I even correct myself when I have given the wrong info (example yesterday with the “Staying On” info I posted).

I am all for debate as long as it is constructive and reasoned and supported by evidence sourced from more places that the BNP website. I personally try to provide as much evidence as I can to support my arguments/statements.

What I do tend to get annoyed with is the rather standard responses of UAF Troll/Paid by the Tories/Part of the NWO etc etc etc, that isn’t debate that to me simply shows the person posting it has no ability to debate and therefore reverts to what I term as the playground bully who can do nothing more than name call etc.