Comment on General Election 2017 by David.

They all vote BNP hey, ROFLOL.

I’m sorry Jon, but even with dozens of BNP members and supporters campaigning on the main BNP website, (which is meant to be the most popular political site in Britain according to the BNP), Facebook and many other sites to get as many BNP supporters as possible to vote in my poll (manipulate my poll) the best they managed was 1,800 odd real votes in 6 months (plus 800 odd cheat votes!).

That’s only 12 real BNP voters visiting my site a day out of about on average 2,000 visitors a day over the entire period (my site didn’t immediately jump to 3,000 visitors a day over night).

The BNP do NOT have the British popular vote, it’s a far right wing party that’s on the fringe of politics and as such the reasonable majority will never vote BNP beyond a protest vote which is why the BNP tend to do badly in general elections.

Since the BNP’s site is very popular (I don’t argue that, I go to it all the time) since they couldn’t muster a massive surge in votes in my poll from the many thousands of visitors a day to the BNP website (they must get over 5,000 visitors a day, I would not be surprised at 10,000+ a day) what I conclude from that is two things.

1. Like my visitors (~3,000 a day to this site) most don’t give a toss about voting in a poll.

2. It strongly suggests as the BNP averaged just 12 votes per day in my poll (probably 10 a day due to the BNP campaigning) a hell of a lot of the visitors to the BNP main website and other BNP websites aren’t BNP supporters. I know for a fact there’s a LOT of people who hate what the BNP stand for (like the majority of the 700,000 people at the Facebook group “1,000,000 United Against the BNP”) and on a daily basis are visiting pro BNP websites for information to use against the BNP.

A forum that was making a joke at my sites expense managed to send 900 voting visitors to the poll in one day (they voted Monster Raving Loony Party). If the BNP are so popular and all people vote BNP as you suggest Jon, why when BNP was an option in the poll and the BNP supporters was actively campaigning to get BNP votes didn’t they have 10,000 plus votes in 6 months?

No other political group has seriously campaigned to get votes to this poll, (I’ve tried, but it’s not worked) the vast majority of the votes in the poll are from organic search engine visitors, most of which don’t care to vote in a poll.

To put it into perspective I estimate (I haven’t worked it out, so very rough estimate) since I made the poll the site averages 2,000 visitors a day, so probably 300,000 visitors in total, only 18,000 have voted (about 125 a day).

David

More Comments on General Election 2017 by David


General Election 2017 Have Your Say!

I completely disagree, although I’m sure the Lib Dems would have rather worked with Labour, there was realistically no way they could form a working coalition for more than a …


General Election 2017 Have Your Say!

4chan /b/ Monster Raving Loony Party Votes Removed from the General Election Poll.

Sometime ago a forum (4chan /b/) got it’s members (most not from the UK, so unlikely to be …


General Election 2017 Have Your Say!

As a BNP supporter who presumably sees the BNP as different to all the other political parties: specifically many BNP supporters have argued on my site the BNP are trustworthy …


General Election 2017 Have Your Say!

And yet BNP supporters (like yourself) keep popping in and posting comments (mostly pointless comments) like this one.

Teach me a lesson and stop posting completely so there’s less comments.

BTW it’s …


General Election 2017 Have Your Say!

BNP were 4th in the poll not 3rd as you say before I removed them as a voting option. You can NOT count the 800 odd BNP votes that was …


More Comments by David


Liberal Democrats Easy Read Manifesto 2017

Thanks for letting me know I’d added the wrong link to the Lib Dems Easy Read Manifesto: benefit of using the Labour manifesto article as a template, easy to make …


Government response : Introduce a moratorium on the hunting of critically declining wading birds petition

Government responded while there were 14,863 signatures (October 21st 2016).

It is unlikely that hunting has had a significant impact on recent population trends for woodcock, snipe and golden plover; trends …


Introduce a moratorium on the hunting of critically declining wading birds petition

Another petition regarding woodcock, snipe and golden plover : https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/167410

Woodcock, Snipe and Golden Plover are shot in the UK despite serious, ongoing population declines. A moratorium should be imposed to …


BNP are a Political Party in Decline

If you’ve been following the BNP since just before the 2010 general election you’d know the BNP are in real trouble with infighting, money problems and generally self-destructive behaviour.

Apparently BNP …


Alternative Vote Better than First Past the Post

Although I don’t particularly like the Alternative Vote system (I agree with Nick, a miserable little compromise) it’s at least better than First Past the Post voting system.

The vast majority …