Comment on General Election 2017 by David.

As a BNP supporter who presumably sees the BNP as different to all the other political parties: specifically many BNP supporters have argued on my site the BNP are trustworthy (don’t lie), democratic and believe in free speech etc…

Why when the BNP owns a website with it’s own open comment system (uses WordPress like my site does) and a forum do you need my site (or for that matter create one yourself Andrew) to discuss general election politics openly?

If the BNP are so democratic and supporting of free speech, why are the open discussions that have occurred on my site NOT happening on the BNP website?

Why do the BNP webmaster(s)/moderators delete non pro BNP comments?

The BNP do argue it’s the most popular UK politics site after all, so if they support free speech and democracy it’s website should be the ideal place for ALL British people to discuss the general election openly.

Good luck if you create a site, you’ve left it way too late to get ranked before the general election: as I’ve said a few times I expected my site not to be doing as well as it is as I created the site a little on the late side (normally I’d give myself over a year to rank a new site this well), I’d normally be expecting it to do well about now (around the 9 month mark).

I give lots of free SEO advice away on my other sites.

David

More Comments on General Election 2017 by David


General Election 2017 Have Your Say!

I completely disagree, although I’m sure the Lib Dems would have rather worked with Labour, there was realistically no way they could form a working coalition for more than a …


General Election 2017 Have Your Say!

They all vote BNP hey, ROFLOL.

I’m sorry Jon, but even with dozens of BNP members and supporters campaigning on the main BNP website, (which is meant to be the most …


General Election 2017 Have Your Say!

4chan /b/ Monster Raving Loony Party Votes Removed from the General Election Poll.

Sometime ago a forum (4chan /b/) got it’s members (most not from the UK, so unlikely to be …


General Election 2017 Have Your Say!

And yet BNP supporters (like yourself) keep popping in and posting comments (mostly pointless comments) like this one.

Teach me a lesson and stop posting completely so there’s less comments.

BTW it’s …


General Election 2017 Have Your Say!

BNP were 4th in the poll not 3rd as you say before I removed them as a voting option. You can NOT count the 800 odd BNP votes that was …


More Comments by David


Liberal Democrats Easy Read Manifesto 2017

Thanks for letting me know I’d added the wrong link to the Lib Dems Easy Read Manifesto: benefit of using the Labour manifesto article as a template, easy to make …


Government response : Introduce a moratorium on the hunting of critically declining wading birds petition

Government responded while there were 14,863 signatures (October 21st 2016).

It is unlikely that hunting has had a significant impact on recent population trends for woodcock, snipe and golden plover; trends …


Introduce a moratorium on the hunting of critically declining wading birds petition

Another petition regarding woodcock, snipe and golden plover : https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/167410

Woodcock, Snipe and Golden Plover are shot in the UK despite serious, ongoing population declines. A moratorium should be imposed to …


BNP are a Political Party in Decline

If you’ve been following the BNP since just before the 2010 general election you’d know the BNP are in real trouble with infighting, money problems and generally self-destructive behaviour.

Apparently BNP …


Alternative Vote Better than First Past the Post

Although I don’t particularly like the Alternative Vote system (I agree with Nick, a miserable little compromise) it’s at least better than First Past the Post voting system.

The vast majority …