If you noticed, why did you keep posting under two names knowing they would be deleted? Does suggest you aren’t too bright!
If your argument is so strong why do you need to post under two or more names?
The above comment was posted twice, the other one was under another name that I’d deleted every comment under that name and it was automatically marked as SPAM. The above is your second try with a different email address (I guess a fake one) since the SPAM software now marks anything you posted under the other email address as SPAM.
Note: over the last few days I’ve deleted over 300 comments by people like you that seem to think the only way to win an argument is post under multiple identities. If a commenter posts under more than one identity ALL their past comments are deleted.
I don’t care what your politics is, though most offenders are right-wing (90%+ BNP supporters), who post under multiple names, though today I’ve deleted about 10 comments from one person supporting Nick Clegg under several names.
If a commenter keeps making the same mistake of posting under multiple names, the software learns and filters your comments as a SPAM.
If you like wasting your time writing a comment that will never be read, keep posting under two or more names.
BTW what is it with people like you blaming me for your stupidity in getting caught? I’m not the person who feels so insecure about their arguments I need to support them with false identities agreeing with myself!
David
More Comments by David
Liberal Democrats Easy Read Manifesto 2017
Thanks for letting me know I’d added the wrong link to the Lib Dems Easy Read Manifesto: benefit of using the Labour manifesto article as a template, easy to make …
Government responded while there were 14,863 signatures (October 21st 2016).
It is unlikely that hunting has had a significant impact on recent population trends for woodcock, snipe and golden plover; trends …
Introduce a moratorium on the hunting of critically declining wading birds petition
Another petition regarding woodcock, snipe and golden plover : https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/167410
Woodcock, Snipe and Golden Plover are shot in the UK despite serious, ongoing population declines. A moratorium should be imposed to …
BNP are a Political Party in Decline
If you’ve been following the BNP since just before the 2010 general election you’d know the BNP are in real trouble with infighting, money problems and generally self-destructive behaviour.
Apparently BNP …
Alternative Vote Better than First Past the Post
Although I don’t particularly like the Alternative Vote system (I agree with Nick, a miserable little compromise) it’s at least better than First Past the Post voting system.
The vast majority …
More Comments on Election 2010 Conservative Petitions and Banning Fox Hunting by David
Election 2010 Conservative Petitions and Banning Fox Hunting
ROFLOL to “I am going to report your page”.
Exactly who are you going to report this page to?
What a numpty!
BTW I don’t have to waste my time arguing for a …
Election 2010 Conservative Petitions and Banning Fox Hunting
Talk about stereotyping Labour supporters, what an idiotic comment!
I don’t fit your retarded stereotype of what you think a Labour supporter is.
How does this fit in with your ideas:
University educated
Happily …
Election 2010 Conservative Petitions and Banning Fox Hunting
“A gamekeeper can kill 2 to 10 foxes in one night, a hunting pack would be doing good to kill 2 foxes within a period of 6 months, I heard …
Election 2010 Conservative Petitions and Banning Fox Hunting
Of course the site is going to be politically biased left of center since that’s where my political beliefs generally reside (not in all areas, but mostly). I’ve never suggested …
Election 2010 Conservative Petitions and Banning Fox Hunting
The majority of Conservative MPs support hunting (they voted against the current ban), so if there’s a Conservative majority after May 6th and David Cameron gives a free vote on …