According to the British National Party websites Economic Policy document the BNP will try to achieve the following if they gain power at the 2010 general election:
Britain’s survival depends on a technology-intensive manufacturing base, protected from globalisation and rampant internationalist exploitation – the core of the British National Party’s plan for rebuilding this nation’s economy after decades of Tory and Labour neglect.
Globalisation has caused the export of jobs and industries to the Far East, and has brought ruin and unemployment to British industries and the communities who depend on them.
Accordingly, the BNP calls for the selective exclusion of foreign-made goods from British markets and the reduction of foreign imports. We will ensure that our manufactured goods are, wherever possible, produced in British factories, employing British workers.
When this is done, unemployment in this country will be brought to an end and secure, well-paid employment will flourish.
We further believe that British industry, commerce, land and other economic and natural assets belong in the final analysis to the British nation and people.
To that end the BNP will restore our economy and land to British ownership and will take active steps to break up the socially, economically and politically damaging monopolies now being established by the supermarket giants.
Fully cognisant of the reality that economic growth is driven primarily by true free enterprise, a BNP government will seek to give British workers a stake in the success and prosperity of the enterprises whose profits their labour creates. Such schemes are the only guarantee of workers being motivated to ensure the success of their employers.
The Labour government recently introduced legislation to discriminate against white males in the job market. This racist legislation is a travesty and gross betrayal of the British working class, and will be repealed forthwith by a BNP government, along with all other measures which in any way discriminate against the indigenous population.
The state institutions were built by British taxpayers and there is a moral duty and obligation on the state to give preference in the job market to native Britons.
The banksters cannot be let off the hook for their role in the current financial crisis. The BNP demands that the banksters responsible for the catastrophe which has crippled the international banking system be held personally legally liable for their actions in terms of corporate governance laws. They should have to pay a personal price for the mess they have created, and not be rewarded with huge bonuses which have come from taxpayer-funded bailouts.
In a nutshell, the BNP plan to rebuild Britain will consist of the following steps:
– The nurturing and encouragement of new and existing British industries;
– The protection of British companies from unfair foreign imports;
– The promotion of domestic competition;
– Increased taxes on companies which outsource work abroad;
– The reintroduction of the married man’s allowance;
– The raising of the inheritance tax threshold to £1 million;
– The encouragement of savings, investment, worker share-ownership and profit-sharing;
– Halving council tax by centralising education costs and eliminating multiculturalism spending and unnecessary bureaucracy;
– The renationalisation of monopoly utilities and services, compensating only individual investors and pension funds. Privatising monopolies does not benefit either the consumer or the country. All that happens is the ‘family silver’ is sold off and monopoly utilities and services are asset-stripped, often by foreign competitors.
The economy should be managed for the benefit of the nation. The other parties are enslaved to laissez-faire globalism, which means that British workers must compete against those in China and India who work for as little as a pound a day.
Oriental countries such as Japan, South Korea and Singapore have managed their economies to combine private enterprise competition with the national good, and these are the models the BNP would emulate.
In a world in which irreplaceable natural resources are being depleted at an alarming rate we have a duty to our children and future generations to move towards economic growth which is socially, environmentally and economically sustainable in the long-term, rather than the present ‘boom and bust’ policies.
Personal tax is far too high. Billions of pounds can be slashed off government spending by inter alia:
– Ending the £9 billion foreign aid budget;
– Ending the £4.5 billion a year wars in Iraq and Afghanistan;
– Ending the untold billions spent subsidising the immigration swindle and all its ancillary costs (benefits, court and jail services, counter-terrorism measures, the “race relations” industry and a host of others);
– Ending the billions pumped into the EU swindle;
– Severely curtailing the tax-subsidised feeding frenzy at Westminster and other levels of government; and
– Cutting back all unnecessary layers of government which have been artificially created by years of politically correct Labour and Tory rule.
The time has come for change.
British National Party Economy Policy :http://bnp.org.uk/policies/economy/
I would be interested to hear both positive and negative views on BNP’s Economy policies in the comments below?
Immigration Myth: Refugees are a burden to taxpayers
Fact: Asylum seekers, refugees and immigrants have made an enormous contribution to the economic and cultural life of the UK. Refugees bring with them a wealth of skills and experience. Even the Home Office has recognised this and made a commitment, through its Integration Unit, to put such skills to good use.
Migrants, including refugees, are far from being a burden on UK taxpayers. On the contrary, in 1999-2000, they made a net fiscal contribution of approximately £2.5 billion, worth 1p on income tax. Research carried out by Personnel Today in November 2001 found that nine out of ten employers want to take on refugees to meet skills shortages, but do not due to ignorance of the law and confusing Home Office paperwork.
Asylum seekers are demonised for draining the state when they are discouraged from being independent because they are legally prevented from working.
View Comment
I will be most certainly voting for the BNP.
Anti BNP sites like this and the blatent media blackout of the BNP in the run up to the election make me feel certain that a vote for the BNP is the correct choice. Furthermore, the current media blackout of the BNP and the excess advertising of UKIP leads me to believe that UKIP are just in fact a government tool to dilute BNP votes!
voting for the BNP
If my General Election 2010 website is so anti-BNP and blacking out the BNP, why have I included this section to the site:
https://general-election-2010.co.uk/
That’s currently about 700 BNP news articles all open to comments.
Secondly explain why when you search BNP in the search box at the top right hand corner of my site: https://general-election-2010.co.uk/index.php?&s=BNP
Over 70 main pages on this site either directly discuss the BNP or the BNP within the comments. This search feature doesn’t search the Party Political News https://general-election-2010.co.uk/ or the Political Forum https://general-election-2010.co.uk/politics/ sections of the site (each one of those are separate systems with their own search). Searching BNP at https://general-election-2010.co.uk/?&s=BNP for example lists 700 pages (will be the 700 BNP news articles).
When I search the comments (it’s an admin feature), of the 5,116 comments as of right now 3,023 comments contain the word BNP. That means over 50% of the comments on this website are about the bloody BNP despite my attempts to keep this a general politics site!
There are thousands of pages on this domain discussing the BNP, what more do you want?
The BNP are a minor political party, with less than 1% of the vote in 2005. Exactly how much coverage do you think a political party of the size of the BNP should get?
The Green Party gets more votes than the BNP and I barely ever see them mentioned on the news. I’ve seen Nick Griffin on the TV more often than Caroline Lucas recently.
Might help if the BNP created a manifesto for the 2010 election, the media would have something to discuss then as the BNP have some crazy ideas for the country!
Come on, what exactly do you expect?
And yes I’m anti BNP, I’m also anti Conservative (trash them all the time), anti UKIP and a little anti Green party (their stance on GM food and other useful scientific breakthroughs irritates me) as well.
David
View Comment
Asylum Seekers benefit the UK…. haha, ok.
Immigration and Diversity are great when you can return to your all white neighbourhood at night, its the hypocracy of liberals they never live amongst their “diversity” apart from on shopping trips to Bond Street never want to acknowledge the bad parts of immigration, study after study has PROVEN that immigration has been of little benefit to the UK.
We have millions on benefits in our country, instead of bringing in cheap labour from abroad, why not get tougher on our own people, reduce their benefits and get them working.
I don’t agree with everything the BNP says on the economy and other matters but I find it laughable that you can smear at their policy while Labour’s economic policy got us into this mess and the Tory’s although slightly better are struggling and as in general with the Tory’s the working class well get the “fuzzy end of the lolipop”.
View Comment
At last!!!!! We have a person with a magnitude of sense!!! I don’t agree with some of the policies of the BNP, but immigration has been the biggest downfall of this country. Labour and the Tories have caused more destruction to this country than Hitler ever did!!! Labour, Tories and the Libs are the FASCISTS!!!
Jon
View Comment
Yawn, you can’t blame hard working foreigners for YOU being unemployed.
Get off your lazy BNP arse and find a job.