Non-point – the difference is British National Party explicitly prohibited “non-indigenous” from joining. Granted, a political party (and indeed, any organisation) should be free to accept and reject whomsoever they desire – as abhorrent as that may be – but explicitly rejecting a section of society isn’t exactly a way to paint your party in a good light.
More Comments by T.S.Andrews
That’d be their hell then… Having to spend eternity near a “disgusting creature” who “flaunts his perversion” in the face of people (Tinky Winky). And I am not sure Dipsy …
Proportional Representation : The Single Transferable Vote
I disagree with the claim that 16 is too young to vote. At 16 a person is deemed mature enough to serve their country, why are they not mature enough …
Compulsory ID Cards, Good or Bad for Britain Poll?
And what if the govt. has a “whoopsie-daisy” and loses this data? There’s already been so much data misplaced, that’s worrying for a start. And what’s more worrying is this …
BNP Manifesto 2010 : Constitutional Change: Protecting and Enhancing Our Heritage
SNP:
Plaid:
(there’s two alone that I picked out in a minute of looking at the GE Westminster candidates – there’s bound to be more. In any case, the number is …
Compulsory ID Cards, Good or Bad for Britain Poll?
Against. The cost (both monetary and in terms of liberty) simply isn’t work it, and the money is better spent elsewhere (eg. greater, more involved community policing or stronger border …
More Comments on BNP Manifesto 2010 : Constitutional Change: Protecting and Enhancing Our Heritage by T.S.Andrews
BNP Manifesto 2010 : Constitutional Change: Protecting and Enhancing Our Heritage
SNP:
Plaid:
(there’s two alone that I picked out in a minute of looking at the GE Westminster candidates – there’s bound to be more. In any case, the number is …