I’m not a big football fan, I normally only watch events like the World Cup, still I’d hate to see the beautiful game of Football damaged by the BNP Immigration policy. The BNP Immigration Policy states: “Stop all new immigration except for exceptional cases” Unless Football players are “exceptional cases” this means British Football teams […]
Continue Reading BNP Immigration Policy Would Damage the Game of Football
The anti-BNPers always say “oh bnp have no support” “they will never get in power” etc etc…. Well 55% of the population support bnp policies as proved by the sky news poll last year. (google it).. Bnp got 1 million votes against all odds, the media organised a massive smear campaign against the bnp , including newspapers, TV, radio, Internet, anti bnpers, uaf – even a organisation in the usa joined in with the elite to smear bnp. but guess what…. the bnp still made the breakthrough they wanted. Now this will encourage alot more people to come out and vote for the bnp, Nick griffin now has a very strong platform to expose the media lies that maybe put off some voters. Times are changing- the liberals have had power for way to long !!
UP the bnp !!! :D
View Comment
You are referring to this poll from SKY News news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Sky-News-Archive/Article/200806413520516
>>>>>>>>>>>>
A Sky News poll has revealed widespread public support for many of the BNP’s policies – but less backing for the party itself. The findings will prove worrying for all the main parties in the run-up to the local elections in nine days’ time.
The internet pollster YouGov questioned 1,841 people between last Friday and Monday.
They were asked whether they supported halting all further immigration to the UK.
Nearly six out of 10 – 59% – who did not know it was a BNP plan, said they would back the idea.
But among those who were told it was BNP policy, the level of support was 48% – a drop of 11% .
More than half of those surveyed agreed all immigrants should be denied the right to bring further members of their family into this country.
However, the number fell by 9% among people who were aware it was a BNP policy.
The average level of support for the BNP’s ideas was 55% among those who were not told where they had come from.
Among those who knew it was 49%.
……
Pollsters say if the BNP changed its image, it could do very well in the local elections.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
The problem with a poll like this is they are asking the questions based on BNP published policies, not what the BNP would actually do in power.
I doubt the pollsters asked if they’d vote for a potential prime minister who denied the holocaust and had party members who believe rape isn’t a serious crime!
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/mayor/women-more-troubled-by-bag-theft-than-rape-bnp-candidate-claims-6655808.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Nick Eriksen, the BNP’s London organiser and the second-highest candidate on its list for the Assembly, is the author of “Sir John Bull,” a notorious far-Right blog which has regularly advocated hatred and abuse against women.”
….
On 24 August 2005, Mr Eriksen wrote: “I’ve never understood why so many men have allowed themselves to be brainwashed by the feminazi myth machine into believing that rape is such a serious crime … Rape is simply sex. Women enjoy sex, so rape cannot be such a terrible physical ordeal.
“To suggest that rape, when conducted without violence, is a serious crime is like suggesting that force feeding a woman chocolate cake is a heinous offence. A woman would be more inconvenienced by having her handbag snatched.
“The demonisation of rape is all part of the feminazi desire to obtain power and mastery over men. Men who go along with the rape myth are either morons or traitors.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>
I wonder if he’d feel the same way if he ended up in prison with a cell mate named Bubba who liked cake of a different persuasion.
The BNP is filled with people like Mr Eriksen and if the BNP gained power it’s people like him who will set not just immigration policy, but all policies!
Labour and the Conservatives haven’t done a brilliant job at running the country so far, but at least you’d feel relatively safe running into them in a dark alley, would you feel safe passing the average BNP candidate when you know many of them idealise people like Hitler?
The BNP are very scary people!!!
David
View Comment
Everyone and every party has a past, such as the conservative party with Enoch Powell. That party could be defined as a racist party if you look into the past; is that brought up? No.
Again it really is sad to see a moderator being so bias; You’re not hear to argue or debate, your job is to moderate the website and make sure the content is suitable.
View Comment
Actually it was a little over 945,000 so not one million, and they haven’t even gone over the million if we add on all the votes they have got since the EU elections.
15 Million people voted in the EU Election and only 945,000 voted for the BNP that’s 14 million 55 thousand THAT DIDN’T so not such a good number now is it really.
Actually if memory servs only arounf 6.6% of the overall votes cast ……. :-(
And remember UKIP jick ya ass with 13 MEP’s and the Tories Kick Ya Ass with 26, the BNP same as the greens on 2 and I would like to point out that the Greens actually polled more votes that the BNP at the EU Elections with just over 1.2 Million.
hahahahahahaha don’t look so hot now does it.
View Comment
Personal for David, I admire you for including the BNP in your site since you clearly dislike them so much.
Despite all the negative comments, have you noticed how much attention they get?
I do not understand why the BNP detractors appear to hate them and sometimes fear them. Perhaps it is a result of past mistakes and associations, or false assumptions, but let us take the democratic view.
The BNP had the support of nearly a million voters in the Euro Elections and are likely to get more in the GE.
It may be a big IF, but IF they win power, then it will only be because the British voters want them to take control and save our country.
You may not respect the BNP, but please respect the British voter, and the near million who voted BNP.
They are ordinary British people, your countrymen, not a million NAZI fanatics.
Visit the BNP site, and watch their vids about the immigrants in London, you might understand them more, and be better placed to comment. The site is easy to find – BNP.org.uk
View Comment
I allow the pro BNP comments (and I posted all the BNP policies I found on their site) because I believe in democracy and free speech. I also hate political correctness, I own another site (own about 100) that has amongst other jokes, racist jokes (gets up to 6,000 visitors a day most related to black and white jokes, I don’t mind being called a cracker), if you saw that site in isolation you’d assume I was a racist (one page has over 600 user comments).
I’m white and English, born in Derbyshire and was brought up to a small degree with a racist attitude: not out right racism, but it was there deep down (Pakistani owned shops were called Paki shops, not so deep down really!). It took going to University to study genetics/evolution to really open my eyes to how retarded racism is.
We all SHOULD know inbreeding is bad (we don’t marry our cousins :)) and yet when it comes to skin colour some racial purists believe it’s bad to mix races with no scientific basis for their belief.
Why is melanin skin content so important?
Mixing up genetics is what keeps a population healthy, the more we mix our genetic makeup the less likely our offspring will suffer from many genetic diseases (recessive genetic diseases in particular).
Interesting example to show how genetic diversity is important: malaria is a serious problem in a lot of countries, there’s evidence carrying one sickle cell anemia gene (which is harmless if you have one copy) can protect an individual from severe malaria attacks (a malaria attack is when the red blood cells sickle or burst due to the malaria parasites growing within). The sickle cell anemia gene is a recessive gene, which means both parents must carry the sickle cell anemia gene to have a chance of passing two copies to their children resulting in sickle cell anemia (awful disease).
Children born with sickle cell anemia don’t do well, but those born with one copy of the sickle cell anemia gene are healthy and have some protection from contracting malaria and from suffering severe malaria attacks. Carrying one gene means the red blood cells are easier to sickle/burst and so the malaria parasite has less chance to take hold (the red blood cells burst before the parasite fully matures = lower parasite load).
There’s a benefit (evolutionary advantage) in carrying one copy of the sickle cell anemia gene in high malaria locations, but it’s not good to have two. This is where genetic diversity comes into play, black people have a higher probability of carrying this gene compared to white people, with a mixed race child (black/white parents for example) you have less chance of their offspring obtaining two copies of the sickle cell anemia gene, but a better chance of obtaining one copy of the gene than from two black parents/two white parents.
Expand this out to all sorts of genes that are terrible when you get two copies and some where one is harmless or beneficial and you can see mixing up our genetics is good for the health of the worlds populations.
Take away a few superficial features like skin colour, hair type/colour etc… and underneath we are all the same. Black people have black skin because their ancestors lived in a high UV location, it’s a protective mechanism to reduce the risks of skin cancer. My ancestors (black people) who migrated to less UV rich locations (like the UK) lost their skin pigmentation (they became white like me) because it served no purpose, in fact it harmed them because with less UV light black skin makes it harder to create vitamin D. So there’s an evolutionary advantage to having white skin if you live in a cool climate like the UK.
It’s dumb to hate a race of people just because of their colour.
The BNP leadership might not openly say/do out right racist things now, but it’s there in the background just waiting for an opportunity to act if they ever get real power. They’ve gone from hating blacks because they are black to hating Muslims because of the fear of the Islamification of the UK, always blaming someone for our problems.
Now protecting our culture that’s a different thing. There are aspects of English/British culture I don’t want to loose, but by the same token I’m open to gaining new ideas from other cultures. If we stood still in cultural terms we’d still be living in caves and I wouldn’t be enjoying a nice cup of tea while I type this (tea isn’t from the UK).
I don’t understand how an intelligent person (like yourself) could vote for the BNP knowing the type of people who run the BNP party, I just don’t get it? Agreeing to a degree with some of their policies, maybe, but voting for the people who run the BNP, NEVER!
David
View Comment
I think genetics is a false argument. In other species, like Giant Pandas, we do not advocate mixing genes in order to save them – it is a silly argument. Jews have tried to keep themselves to themselves for thousands of years, and they are some of the most intelligent and dynamic people on the planet.
However that is not the point, the point is not that BNP blame the immigrants for our problems, the point is that immigration on such a large scale is changing our society, and causing resentment.
Islam is a progressive religion, unlike Christianity which turns the other cheek. Islam WILL attempt to take over.
The immigrants are not the cause of the problem, they ARE the problem. Labour, Tory, and Europe are the cause.
Islam does not integrate, by and large it remains insular.
They take over, – my father was born in Wembley, and I lived there as a child (66 now). I felt sick when I saw the current situation there.
As to why I have decided to vote BNP – well it is simple – there is no other choice.
Labour and Tory clearly don’t see the problem, (no more than you do), they caused it.
To vote for a mainstream party is to vote for more of the same. And I do not want more of the same.
As for intelligence, there are a great many supporters of the BNP who are far more intelligent than I am.
Perhaps it is their intelligence that enables them to see where the current immigration policy is leading?
Do you really want to see our country swallowed up by Europe and over-run by immigrants?
If you do, then vote as you wish. If not, then vote BNP.
View Comment
Genetics is not a false argument, can I remind you of what Hitler did in the name of genetics under the mistaken belief of a pure German race and that was less than a decade before you were born!
The BNP want genetic purity to some degree.
In genetic terms strength comes from diversity, you’ve made my point with your Giant Panda comment. The Giant Panda is a member of the bear family (Black Bears, Brown Bears, Polar Bears, Grizzly Bears) but is so specialized that unlike it’s cousins it can not breed with other bears. Polar Bears do mate with Grizzly Bears and we get something called a Grizzly–Polar Bear hybrid or Pizzly (I love that name :)).
There’s only a few thousand Giant Pandas, because they can not adapt to a changing environment.
You also make my point with your “Jews have tried to keep themselves to themselves for thousands of years” example. Because of self imposed genetic isolation it’s narrowed the gene pool to a degree that the Ashkenazi Jewish population (European Jews) have a higher incidence of certain genetic disorders including: Canavan, Tay-Sachs, Gaucher, Cystic Fibrosis (and others). Many other genetically isolated populations suffer from the same sorts of lack of genetic diversity in their gene pool resulting in an increase in genetic diseases.
A lack of genetic diversity is also how evolution (natural selection) works to form new species. Take a small population of a species and isolate them, wait a long period of time and subject that population to environmental changes and you eventually produce a new species (simplified version ;-)). As a species I think we are past evolutionary change caused by natural selection, we are too altruistic in nature to allow the weak to perish.
David
View Comment
David
I understand genetics and evolution.
The argument is about neither. Nor is it about race.
As you well know.
It is about culture and religion.
It is about national pride, patriotism, heritage, ancestry, social infrastructure, and all those things that bind us together as a community.
Birds of a feather flock together.
A multicultural society is not a community.
But you indulge in the standard allegations of Nazi thugs and racists bent on conquering the world, while you insist that blending all the races together is a good thing, flying in the face of millions of years of evolution that produced the multitude of diverse races in the first place.
Vote BNP
View Comment
“Islam is a progressive religion, unlike Christianity which turns the other cheek. Islam WILL attempt to take over.”
You clearly don’t know your religious history, Christianity started as a small religious sect and partially through force has spread through out the world.
I won’t defend early Islam followers either since like early Christians force has been used to ‘spread the word’.
Both religions to some degree have been built on violent conquest. Christians tried to convert Muslim areas and Muslims tried to convert Christian areas, sometimes they succeeded.
Look up the Crusades for example.
David
View Comment
The one thing you, David, and most pro-immigration
people, seem to conveniently miss is that most of the general public – about 70% – do not want this tiny overcrowded island to become even more overcrowded.
Also, there is more involved than “the colour of skin”. Immigrants are having huge families, insisting on special treatment,changing our way of life, and making life just so damn complicated. It’s becoming a nightmare.
Saying inter-racial marriage is going to prevent ‘in-breeding’ is just a red herring. The gene-pool in a population this size is vast!
This genetic ‘reason’ is JUST the sort of stupid reason that Labour would love – along with “they help the economy”, “they will look after our ageing population”, and “there are no true British – so let in everyone in the world”. All reasons dreamt up recently by the left to brainwash the electorate.
The overwhelming reason people are supporting the BNP is that this country is FULL UP.
View Comment
“We need a well thought out immigration policy”
For the time being, a very strict “exceptional cases only” policy seems more sensible to me. There are over 2m unemployed (excess workers) yet we are allowing more people into the country. Granted, this figure isn’t as large once you factor in immigration, but it still adds up. Question is this: if there is already large unemployment, why is the govt. still so keen on immigration? Don’t get me wrong, if there’s job shortages or plenty of room to accommodate people then by all means allow immigration.
The problem with UKIP’s policy is that it specifies an exact date to cut immigration. Why is this an issue? Allowing immigration may still be unwise after the five year period (or it may be fine to allow immigration before the five year period).
A more sensible policy would be to halt immigration for an unspecified time until the need (and ability to accommodate) for larger scale immigration arises again, and on the understanding that immigrants pledge loyalty to UK of GB and NI.
With regards to football, I couldn’t really care less about the game. However, football is big business and is a stimulus for the economy so I would imagine foreign footballers would be considered an “exceptional case” because they add to the country (albeit not in a “first-hand” sense). And if they weren’t considered an “exceptional case”? If this affected the country badly, the BNP (or another party, if they adopted a similar line) would be voted out of office * .
[*] This is assuming, of course, they got into power. Being realistic, the BNPs first goal would be to get one seat from one of their strongholds. Let’s face it, although it would be a jolly good kick in the bum for LibLabCon they are hardly going to have much power with just one MP. (Though one MP is not a waste as it’d serve as a nice reminder to the politicians who is ultimately in charge – the people).
View Comment
I’m not sure if your last couple of paragraphs should be read as “The BNP won’t win this election, so what their policies are don’t really matter, there’s other reasons for voting BNP”?
If not I’ve heard this argument before as an excuse for how poorly thought out the BNP’s policies are, so…
I’m sorry, but politicians are meant to be aiming to run our country, I don’t care which party they stand for, their policies should be realistic and well thought out and be able to withstand scrutiny from an eligible voter like myself** and anyone else reading them.
**I’m not that political, as mentioned before this website is my first step into politics and if I can easily tear big holes in BNP policies, with my limited political experience, they’ve got something wrong!
You can suggest football players might fall under the exceptions criteria, but why would they, why would foreign footballers be more important under a BNP government than doctors, nurses, dentists, plumbers, scientists, engineers, teachers…?
Like you I’m not that bothered about football (probably watch 3 games a year when nothing else on TV, not including World Cup matches) and so it wouldn’t have any impact on my life if Manchester United etc… could only hire British born people. However, I would be affected if they stopped doctors, nurses, dentists etc… entering the country to work and eventually settle as British citizens, do they fall under the BNP exceptions?
Surely a well thought out immigration policy would take this sort of thing into account from day one and not leave it under exceptional cases? Like with the UKIP immigration policy:
“The party says work permits should continue to be issued to companies requiring employees to work in the UK throughout this moratorium period.”
Like you I’m not sure about the UKIP five-year moratorium on immigration policy, though for different reasons, I think the period is too long. I wouldn’t have an issue with a one or two year freeze on immigration whilst new legislation etc… is passed.
The BNP immigration policy is open ended and since the BNP pretty much blame everything wrong with Britain on immigration I don’t see them restarting immigration in the future. Seriously do you?
My reading of the BNP is they want to close our borders, remove as many non British people from Britain (especially Muslims) as possible, take back control of British land and businesses and become self sufficient in both manufacturing, energy production and farming. I assume the concept is we’ll be able to train British born people to be our doctors etc… and so won’t need immigration.
Unfortunately for the BNP policies, we live in the real world where we no longer control 3/4s of the worlds resources, we rely heavily on trade (we’d starve and freeze without it) and don’t have a highly skilled population to fill all skilled jobs.
To achieve what the BNP wants would take decades and in the meantime we’d need immigration to fill the gap (takes a decade to train a doctor including GCSE’s and A-Levels). A smart immigration policy would be to control immigration in a way that benefits Britain, we’d only let in skilled workers we NEED, whilst encouraging our young people to take on skills we need, so long term (a decade from now) we’d need less immigration (labour and the Conservatives have policies for this sort of thing).
Also don’t get me wrong I think we should be more self sufficient, for example it’s madness to have to rely on countries like Russia for our gas and Iraq for our oil, the sooner we develop renewable energy sources (which we HAVE to achieve by the middle of this century) the better!
David
View Comment
“I’m sorry, but politicians are meant to be aiming to run our country, I don’t care which party they stand for, their policies should be realistic and well thought out and be able to withstand scrutiny from an eligible voter like myself** and anyone else reading them.”
I think the point of what the BNP are trying to do is just get someone elected to the House by any way possible and to have more of a say on what they feel matters to the average British citizen. They might not be nice to certain people (which politicians are?) but they appeal to other certain people.
Can you imagine the sheer horror they would probably feel if every single one of their candidates got elected?? They wouldn’t know what to do with themselves!
Unfortunately a lot of people don’t read manifesto’s or understand or care how the policies would work. Unfortunately a fair number of people left the school of “what my dad always told me” and graduated from the University of “The Sun Newspaper”
View Comment
I can’t find fault in your arguments above Sarah, but it still doesn’t detract from the fact many BNP policies are a joke.
It should concern any potential BNP voter that whoever wrote the BNP policies hasn’t got a clue about how to run our country and aren’t even smart enough to write policy documents that make sense: note I’m not talking here about writing the best possible policies for the country, just that when read they make sense.
For example there is no sense in the BNP pulling all our soldiers out of wars, (I want our soldiers home as well BTW) stating up front we will not go into a war unless we have to, (which I agree with) BUT on the other hand increase our armed forces strength and all adults have to do military national service. So in the future we won’t be part of NATO type wars, but we’ll be increasing the size of our armed forces (the majority will have military training). If we aren’t going to have any more wars why do we need more soldiers, why does everyone need military training, what are they for and isn’t that a waste of tax payers money? Wouldn’t it be better to train people in useful skills so they can compete in the 21st century world economy, why waste money on military training if we don’t need it under a BNP government? Suggests the BNP are either incompetent or have ulterior motives: maybe world domination, they do talk a lot about a war with Islam, who knows!
The BNP and it’s supporters can argue it’s not important as they’ll never get their current policies passed, even if they did win loads of seats, (I think they’d be shocked if they got 10 MPs), but the truth is the BNP can’t even write a decent policy document that makes sense.
It’s not too much to ask that their policies add up. I suppose under the BNP the government would have bought Cadbury’s to keep it British. Where would that 11 billion come from?
It’s a BNP policy to buy back/acquire foreign owned British lands and businesses, but the reality is the government could never afford to pay for even a fraction of British businesses that are foreign owned (they’d have to steal them) and more importantly it would drive foreign investment away from our shores and that would be an economic disaster (would cost millions of jobs). Why do the BNP officials who wrote their policy documents not understand this? It suggests they are quite frankly stupid!
I have to agree with you it would be funny to see the BNP win all their seats, Nick Griffin as PM, he lacks the ability to run a country, he couldn’t even run a business successfully (he was declared bankrupt)!
David
View Comment
“I suppose under the BNP the government would have bought Cadbury’s to keep it British.”
The state can’t get involved so that wouldn’t happen regardless
First of all, I’d like to say i don’t live in Great Britain, I am Canadian. With that said, i still agree with the BNP policies of immigration. If anything, having purely english born football players would only make the sport more exciting. The fact is most football players arn’t white, they are black, just stating the obvious here, but black people are african. So when the french are playing africans on the french team, and the english are playing africans on the english team, and the italians are playing africans on the italian team, is it really going to be england vs. france? or france vs italy? it’s all africans vs. africans! In my opinion thats boring as hell. Theres no pride in your own team or heritage when your country wins anymore because 80% of your home team is from another country. Just like hockey in Canada. You think if Team canada imported a bunch of black guys from africa cause they are better athletes, just so we would have a better chance of winning, people would still watch? hell no! cause they arnt canadian! sure, maybe if you had purely english football players your team wouldnt win as much, but at least you’ve got some sense of pride when your team does win. try showing a little support for your own background and heritage people. vote BNP!
View Comment
Well, if it is a choice of having
a) slightly less good football teams, or
b) having a happy cohesive society with less crime, no positive discrimination, no race relations industry funded by the taxpayer, a more effective police unhampered by fear of being called racist, an end to “no-go” areas, schools teaching British history again, not to mention an end to previously unheard of crimes such as gang rape and mugging….
I think I could do without the football, thank you very much!
Also the argument that we need to import highly skilled surgeons, footballers etc means we end up with millions of unskilled workers from the Third World.
View Comment
So Roger, you think that allowing everyone who completes National Service to have a Rifle and ammunition in their home will reduce the crime rate?
You think that anyone who refuses to complete National service should have their right to vote removed?
Because by voting BNP that’s what you are agreeing to.
View Comment
That’s a good point, imagine all those National Service guns on the streets of Britian! Lets see, millions of guns on the streets of Britain, but a BNP supporter expects:
What a load of rubbish, having more guns on the street would likely make the above problems worse, not better.
And since when are immigrants responsible for all muggings and gang rapes! We’ve had those problems forever.
David
View Comment
Personally I don’t agree with everyone being allowed to keep guns at home, but what we have now is guns being readily available to criminals, but the law-abiding homeowner being disarmed. That can’t be right.
If the criminals are disarmed then I don’t mind being unarmed. If some criminals have guns but the police and law and order system is effective, then..well..OK I don’t mind us not being allowed guns.
As for immigrants not being responsible for muggings and gang rapes I would say that mugging is a traditional West Indian crime, and that not too many people dispute that black youths are responsible for much (if not the overwhelming majority) of gun crime in the UK – the Met has even set up a special unit for this.
I found an article by Sorious Samura on gang rape: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/gang-rape-is-it-a-race-issue-1711381.html
Have a look at his Dispatches programme if you can find it on the net somewhere. It’s an eye opener.
(Bear in mind that as far as the official statistics on crime are concerned, “white” includes Middle Easterners)
View Comment
THE RIGHT TO BARE ARMS IS BRITISH NOT AMERICAN
YOU LET THEM CHANGE THE LAW, SO THEY CAN WALK ALLOVER US TRUE BRITTONS
YOU TALK ABOUT IT BUT YOU DONT KNOW A DAMN THING, IV SPENT ALOT OF TIME IN EASTERN EUROPE(NOT IN HOLIDAY RESORTS) AND ITS REALLY REALLY BAD
YOU DONT WANT IT HERE IN THE UK FOR THE SAKE OF YOUR KIDS
THIS LAND IS OURS BY RIGHT AS TRUE BRITTONS
SO UNITE AND GET BRIATAIN OUT OF EUROPE AND EUROPE OUT OF BRITAIN BEFORE ITS TOO LATE
View Comment
We have millions of unskilled and unmotivated BNP voters who could do better for britain by moving to the “third world”
Grow up. This is the third world. Where have you been hiding ?
this is ridiculous 1st off professional footballers are millionares so it would be fair to say they will be contributing a lot to the economy, secondly spain won euro 2008 with an all white spanish team with the exception of marcos senna who was a brazilian with a spanish passport and italy won the world cup in 2006 with a completely white italian squad, so to say the standard would decrease if immigrants dont enter is untrue, there are good white british kids who play football, just a lot of the time they get overlooked, and surely if we stop immigration of skilled workers doesnt that mean that actual white british kids will stand more of a chance of getting a job in this field because they might look to train in that field if they think they stand a chance of getting a career.
View Comment
I don’t know a great deal about football, but I do know the average footballer is not paid millions. It’s the minority like Rooney, Beckham, Ronaldo etc… that get the ridiculous sums of money to play a game. The vast majority are on far more modest pay packets.
Am I to read your comment correctly that you think the BNP immigration policy that would stop foreign players playing for British teams would be good for British born football players? The idea being British football teams will have no choice but to hire home grown talent?
You think that sort of protectionism would be good for the game of football and the country?
Have you considered if the BNP gained power and passed their immigration policy as is, other countries would stop playing football with British teams?
David
View Comment
Short answer, no they wouldn’t train cos eastenders is on and they need their degree in Media studies to stack shelves. It’s not an issue of immigration its lazy brits who cannot be bothered, BNP voters ruined this country by being so damn lazy, raise your kids right and the crime will disappear funny how areas with mostly white BNP voters have such high crime, surely this can’t be related?
View Comment
jimbob
true fact is i could study and do your job easy
but you have not got the stomach or balls to ever be able to do the job i was trained to do
one of the biggest problems this country has is big mouthed cowards hiding behind desks preaching they are something special
i know atleast my kids will write our BRAVE dad on my gravestone
where as yours will no doubt read here lies a PUSSY RIP
bnp for a chance to free this once great nation
View Comment
Max in case you haven’t noticed yet, I’m deleting many of your comments.
If you read the commenting policy you will have read
“I’m also going to delete any small comments that add nothing to the debates”
Silly little comments like
“communism doesn’t work
so being honest i’ll take freedom at any cost”
that are not worthy of debate are deleted. Remember this isn’t a forum where it doesn’t matter if low quality comments are added because the software creates another page (on a forum each page is limited to say 20 comments). With blog software (WordPress) the comments are threaded, each page allows just 10 threads (I had to set it really low), but each thread can potential stretch to about 100 comments, which means a page like this could have 1,000 comments!!! I can’t let little comments that add nothing to the debates to remain, I have to limit them to make the site work.
The comment of yours I’m responding to is very low quality (I considered deleting it), all you do is insult the previous commenter and add unverifiable information. For all we know you are a white unemployed skinhead with Nazi tattoos all over your body, but it would be wrong to make that assumption and stereotype you as a typical BNP supporter. Yet you make the assumption you could do Jimbob’s job without even knowing what he does (could be a brain surgeon for all you know) and that he is a coward. Why did you insult him like that?
I’m getting bored of having to read your comments and decide if I should keep them or not. If it was the odd low quality comment, that would be fine, we all create the odd one or two. Yours are 90% low quality, add some effort to your comments or I’ll take the easy root and delete them all.
Remember commenting on my site is a privilege not a right, so put some effort into your response or I’ll delete them all.
David
View Comment
good thats the amunition i wanted all copied to paste into a real room, proof you imigrant loving traitors to this country only print what you want read by the real public
by the way tapes of proof of slovakia flooding 500,000 tickets sent to bmp
i only hope we meet in person soon to show you i am black proud to be british unlike you fucking traitors
View Comment
Sheesh, another loony toon BNP supporter notices I don’t support the BNP and their far right wing fringe political ideas.
What a big upset that will be at the general election. A private website owner deletes comments on his privately owned site that’s not affiliated with any political party from BNP supporting numpties. Did I mention this sites owned by me, an individual, moi, AKA not a political party or political group.
Oh no, what have I done, I’ve only gone and handed the general election to the BNP, oh no, end of the world is nigh, the pod people are coming to get me, where is my BNP tin foil hat to protect me from the government reading my thoughts with their microwave oven machines.
Max, you might as well save your time, I’ll be deleting ALL of your comments from now on, they add nothing to the site. I’ve wasted enough time on BNP idiots like you already since creating this site.
Don’t forget to take a screenshot of this comment, that’s bound to win the BNP the general election.
ROFLOL
David
View Comment
No interest in football. It was the beautiful game – it is no longer. Too much money involved. Everything now is celebrity. The real heroes are unsung – good lads (and lasses) who risk their lives defusing bombs etc. in a hellhole that they were despatched to by a government that wants to break the good things about this country. I hate ideology. I do vote BNP despite their leader not being too coherent (due to be changed I reckon) – its the message that matters. Immigrating an amorphous mass of people who hate us ”long term residents” and show it by wearing the burka etc. and refuse to learn English (or Welsh) is the action of a treasonable government. Members of which also are guilty of robbing their fellow citizens. The punishment for which should be shooting. I mean it.
I remember the country poorer but with far better
community relations. Every step this government takes degrades this country. I believe in worldwide genetic diversity but not all stuck on one small island. Rainbow nation = rainbow hellhole.
Next to these truly important issues, do you really think I care about a ball game?????
View Comment
Did I read your comment correctly that you think the BNP will get rid of Nick Griffin soon?
Come to think of it Nick Griffin has pretty much handed the seats they stand a chance on to other parties as they have no money to campaign now. Maybe when he looses the relevant seats (those few seats they have a chance on) as he’s spent all the BNP’s money on stupid court cases he couldn’t possibly win and so couldn’t afford to campaign at root level (how the BNP gains support, knocking on doors and posting hate mongering literature) the members will kick him out!
Nick Griffin needs to learn a very simple and basic political lesson.
Fight the political battles you can win.
I bet non BNP candidates in the BNP strong areas can’t believe how stupid the BNP’s been recently with squandering it’s limited resources just before an election. Then again good old Nick did have to declare bankruptcy when his business failed in the 90s, so he doesn’t have a good track record when it comes to managing money.
David
View Comment
Sweet Jesus (he was of middle eastern descent by the way, you may need to remind yourselves)where do you BNP voters learn this crap? The local pub? Have any of you ever talked to anyone not of your own (limited, thankfully) gene pool, it’s a shame in an age of scientific advancement we can’t breed out the idiot gene.
View Comment
I’d love to meet you in a pub, ranting about BNP.People like you have no balls just sit behind your screen slagging everyone else off.Unless you are not old enough to get in a pub.
“I’d love to meet you in a pub, ranting about BNP.”
Why, what would you do to Jimbob if you heard him talking about the BNP that way?
Thinly veiled threats are pathetic and shows you don’t have the skills to win an argument with reasoned debate.
Tell us what’s so great about the BNP immigration policy when we’d be loosing thousands of skilled workers (BNP would kick them all out) that we need because British people aren’t training for the right jobs?
I note not one BNP supporter has been able to argue against the premise of my “BNP Immigration Policy Would Damage the Game of Football” article. The BNP would damage the game of football just like they’d damage every British industry that uses skilled immigrant workers.
David
View Comment
Jon,
You are in serious need of taking off your own rose tinted glasses, Street Parties? get real man the last time that happened was in the 70’s.
As for religion less than 15% of British people say they are religious in any way, so you think we need to force 85% of British people to become Christian?
And you are just another standard BNP supporter is all the fault of the muslims, come on man wake up open your eyes and look around you.
Are there really terrorists in every street? are bombs going off every five minutes? are the muslims making you convert to their religion? do they come knocking your door every week like the bloody jovo’s that come banging my door every Sunday despite me telling them every week I can’t be his witness as I never saw the accident.
View Comment